Suicidal Behavior and Personality Group Affiliation: Approaches and Research Directions

Introduction. As it follows from a number of scientific works, not only suicide rates, but also their motives and ways of committing suicide vary widely in different countries, strata of society and strata of the population. In recent decades, research on this issue has become interdisciplinary and cross-cultural. Suicidal behavior is increasingly considered in the context of the suicidal person’s belonging to a certain social group or cultural community. Objective. To analyze the impact of an individual’s membership in a large social group or cultural community on suicidal behavior. The main directions of suicidal behavior research. In the vast array of theoretical and research works the following directions of suicidal behavior study can be distinguished: existential, clinical, socio-demographic, socio-cultural and socio-psychological. Starting from E. Durkheim’s sociological etude “Suicide”, the group affiliation of an individual is considered as a leading factor of suicidal behavior. However, the sociological approach appears limited because its proponents place excessive emphasis on demographic variables rather than on the psychological significance of suicide and the values of the individual prone to suicidal behavior. A. Adler’s socio-psychological conceptualization of suicide is partly responsible for overcoming these limitations. Adler’s socio-psychological concept of suicide, which takes into account not only demographic indicators, but also how suicides perceive, evaluate and experience their own group affiliation and the values of their social group. According to A. Adler, the predictors of suicide are a sense of community (belonging) and social interests of the individual. Sense of community and group belonging as a factor of suicidal behavior. Comparison of studies conducted in three countries (Russia / USSR, Japan and the USA) allows us to identify two socio-psychological factors of suicidal behavior: 1) negative attitude to one’s own group or cultural identity; 2) hypertrophy of the sense of community and belonging, leading to a decrease in the value of one’s own personality and individual life. Discussion. As modern cross-cultural studies show, suicidal behavior can be observed both at the deficit of the sense of community and group belonging and at the high level of development of this sense. This is conditioned, on the one hand, by the attitude of a suicide victim to his/her social group and cultural identity, and, on the other hand, by the historically formed attitude of society to suicide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovative science psychology pedagogy defectology
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2024-7-3-50-66
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suicidal Behavior and Personality Group Affiliation: Approaches and Research Directions

F. R. Filatov
1 citations
Innovative science psychology pedagogy defectology
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
0.64
article

Suicidal Behavior and Personality Group Affiliation: Approaches and Research Directions

F. R. Filatov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. As it follows from a number of scientific works, not only suicide rates, but also their motives and ways of committing suicide vary widely in different countries, strata of society and strata of the population. In recent decades, research on this issue has become interdisciplinary and cross-cultural. Suicidal behavior is increasingly considered in the context of the suicidal person’s belonging to a certain social group or cultural community. Objective. To analyze the impact of an individual’s membership in a large social group or cultural community on suicidal behavior. The main directions of suicidal behavior research. In the vast array of theoretical and research works the following directions of suicidal behavior study can be distinguished: existential, clinical, socio-demographic, socio-cultural and socio-psychological. Starting from E. Durkheim’s sociological etude “Suicide”, the group affiliation of an individual is considered as a leading factor of suicidal behavior. However, the sociological approach appears limited because its proponents place excessive emphasis on demographic variables rather than on the psychological significance of suicide and the values of the individual prone to suicidal behavior. A. Adler’s socio-psychological conceptualization of suicide is partly responsible for overcoming these limitations. Adler’s socio-psychological concept of suicide, which takes into account not only demographic indicators, but also how suicides perceive, evaluate and experience their own group affiliation and the values of their social group. According to A. Adler, the predictors of suicide are a sense of community (belonging) and social interests of the individual. Sense of community and group belonging as a factor of suicidal behavior. Comparison of studies conducted in three countries (Russia / USSR, Japan and the USA) allows us to identify two socio-psychological factors of suicidal behavior: 1) negative attitude to one’s own group or cultural identity; 2) hypertrophy of the sense of community and belonging, leading to a decrease in the value of one’s own personality and individual life. Discussion. As modern cross-cultural studies show, suicidal behavior can be observed both at the deficit of the sense of community and group belonging and at the high level of development of this sense. This is conditioned, on the one hand, by the attitude of a suicide victim to his/her social group and cultural identity, and, on the other hand, by the historically formed attitude of society to suicide.

Innovative science psychology pedagogy defectologyVol. 7(3)
Institute of Service and Entrepreneurship of DGTU (RU), Don State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.