Comparison of Ingestion of Different Size Hard and Soft Bodies Into a Representative Fan Assembly Model

Abstract Foreign matter ingestion into a jet engine is a significant hazard to the safety of aircraft. While soft body ingestions (i.e., bird or ice ingestions) have been extensively researched, the threat posed by uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) is a more recent concern due to their recent rise in popularity and has not been thoroughly studied. To better understand the damage caused by UAS ingestions, it is crucial to examine the resulting ingestion damage in comparison to birds of similar mass. This analysis is an essential initial step in determining how previous knowledge regarding soft body ingestions can relate to this new threat. To properly analyze these ingestions, development of a model that accurately represents a fan assembly is essential. This model should include a fan, as well as representative boundary conditions for the ingestion, such as blade retention systems, nose cone, casing, and shaft. Items that are analyzed during the ingestion include the overall damage to the fan blades, average and peak forces imparted on the retention systems, impact loads with the casing, and transient loads due to impact on the shaft. The foreign object models used were experimentally validated at their nominal sizes to increase confidence in the results. Comparison of the effects of ingestion of UAS and birds of difference mass into the representative fan model are presented and discussed to gain a better understanding of the differences between soft and hard body ingestion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066604
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Applied Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Ingestion of Different Size Hard and Soft Bodies Into a Representative Fan Assembly Model

Kiran D’Souza, Dushyanth Sirivolu, Rashid E. Mattar
1 citations
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Engineering Applied Research
0.26
article

Comparison of Ingestion of Different Size Hard and Soft Bodies Into a Representative Fan Assembly Model

Kiran D’Souza, Dushyanth Sirivolu, Rashid E. Mattar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Foreign matter ingestion into a jet engine is a significant hazard to the safety of aircraft. While soft body ingestions (i.e., bird or ice ingestions) have been extensively researched, the threat posed by uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) is a more recent concern due to their recent rise in popularity and has not been thoroughly studied. To better understand the damage caused by UAS ingestions, it is crucial to examine the resulting ingestion damage in comparison to birds of similar mass. This analysis is an essential initial step in determining how previous knowledge regarding soft body ingestions can relate to this new threat. To properly analyze these ingestions, development of a model that accurately represents a fan assembly is essential. This model should include a fan, as well as representative boundary conditions for the ingestion, such as blade retention systems, nose cone, casing, and shaft. Items that are analyzed during the ingestion include the overall damage to the fan blades, average and peak forces imparted on the retention systems, impact loads with the casing, and transient loads due to impact on the shaft. The foreign object models used were experimentally validated at their nominal sizes to increase confidence in the results. Comparison of the effects of ingestion of UAS and birds of difference mass into the representative fan model are presented and discussed to gain a better understanding of the differences between soft and hard body ingestion.

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerVol. 147(2)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Engineering Applied Research
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.