Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey

Employers are adopting algorithmic hiring technology throughout the recruitment pipeline. Algorithmic fairness is especially applicable in this domain due to its high stakes and structural inequalities. Unfortunately, most work in this space provides partial treatment, often constrained by two competing narratives, optimistically focused on replacing biased recruiter decisions or pessimistically pointing to the automation of discrimination. Whether, and more importantly what types of , algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than low-tech alternatives currently remains unanswered, to the detriment of trustworthiness. This multidisciplinary survey caters to practitioners and researchers with a balanced and integrated coverage of systems, biases, measures, mitigation strategies, datasets, and legal aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. Our work supports a contextualized understanding and governance of this technology by highlighting current opportunities and limitations, providing recommendations for future work to ensure shared benefits for all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696457
Citations
50
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey

Matthew Dennis, David Graus, Philipp Hacker, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius et al.
50 citations
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
26.30
article

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey

Matthew Dennis, David Graus, Philipp Hacker, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Jorge Saldivar, Nina Baranowska, Alessandro Fabris, Asia J. Biega
article en
50 citations

Abstract

Employers are adopting algorithmic hiring technology throughout the recruitment pipeline. Algorithmic fairness is especially applicable in this domain due to its high stakes and structural inequalities. Unfortunately, most work in this space provides partial treatment, often constrained by two competing narratives, optimistically focused on replacing biased recruiter decisions or pessimistically pointing to the automation of discrimination. Whether, and more importantly what types of , algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than low-tech alternatives currently remains unanswered, to the detriment of trustworthiness. This multidisciplinary survey caters to practitioners and researchers with a balanced and integrated coverage of systems, biases, measures, mitigation strategies, datasets, and legal aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. Our work supports a contextualized understanding and governance of this technology by highlighting current opportunities and limitations, providing recommendations for future work to ensure shared benefits for all stakeholders.

ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and TechnologyVol. 16(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), European University Viadrina (DE), National Health Care Institute (NL), Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
26.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.