Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health Research: Cross-Sectional Observational Study
Most of the PLSs published in the NIHR's National Journals Library have poor readability due to their complexity and use of jargon. None were readable at a level in keeping with the average reading age of the UK population. There were significant variations in readability and jargon scores depending on the research topic, funding program, and other factors. Notably, the readability of the original funding proposal seemed to significantly impact the final report's readability. Ways of improving the accessibility of PLSs are needed, as is greater clarity over who and what they are for.
Authors
- Iain Lang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8473-2350)
- Ken Stein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5842-9972)
- Kristin Liabo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-1261)
- Kate Boddy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-5488)
- Jo Day (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5164-3036)
- Lauren Asare (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3868-7987)
- Angela G. King (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-549X)
Institutions
- University of Exeter (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Published
- 2024-09-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/50862
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Text Readability and Simplification
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.04