Academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit

Six scholarly publishers have been hit with an antitrust lawsuit for allegedly appropriating billions of dollars in public funds that the plaintiffs argue would otherwise have been used to carry out scientific research. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York by plaintiffs that include a researcher who says they conducted peer review for all six companies : Elsevier, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, Sage Publications, Wiley, and Wolters Kluwer. The complaint alleges that the publishers engaged in a scheme that, in addition to diverting taxpayer money, has prevented scholars from freely exchanging information and created a peer-review crisis. “The Scheme has held back science, delaying advances across all fields of research,” it says . The suit lays out three main claims. One is that the six publishers colluded to fix the price of peer review at zero by linking researchers’ unpaid labor to their ability to

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10229-leadcon
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
C&EN Global Enterprise
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
article

Academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
article en

Abstract

Six scholarly publishers have been hit with an antitrust lawsuit for allegedly appropriating billions of dollars in public funds that the plaintiffs argue would otherwise have been used to carry out scientific research. The complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York by plaintiffs that include a researcher who says they conducted peer review for all six companies : Elsevier, Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, Sage Publications, Wiley, and Wolters Kluwer. The complaint alleges that the publishers engaged in a scheme that, in addition to diverting taxpayer money, has prevented scholars from freely exchanging information and created a peer-review crisis. “The Scheme has held back science, delaying advances across all fields of research,” it says . The suit lays out three main claims. One is that the six publishers colluded to fix the price of peer review at zero by linking researchers’ unpaid labor to their ability to

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 102(29)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.