Maximum Cardinality <i>f</i> -Matching in Time <i>O</i> ( <i>n</i> <sup>2/3</sup> <i>m</i> )

We present an algorithm that finds a maximum cardinality \(f\) -matching of a simple graph in time \(O(n^{2/3}m)\) . Here, \(f:V\to\mathbb{N}\) is a given function and an \(f\) -matching is a subgraph wherein each vertex \(v\in V\) has degree \(\leq f(v)\) . This result generalizes a string of algorithms that concentrate on simple bipartite graphs. The bipartite case is based on the notion of level graph, introduced by Dinic for network flow. In general graphs this notion breaks down: Vertices no longer have unique levels, and there are too many levels to analyze the corresponding level graph like bipartite graphs ( \(\Theta(n^{2})\) vs. \(n\) ). We use “natural” levels to prove properties of shortest augmenting trails (e.g., formulas for trail length). We use “shortened” levels to derive the algorithm’s time bound. The algorithm, unmodified, is also efficient on multigraphs, achieving time \(O(\min\{\sqrt{f(V)},n\} m)\) for \(f(V)=\sum_{v}f(v)\) . The special case \(f\equiv 1\) shows the algorithm duplicates the classic time bound for maximum cardinality matching, \(O(\sqrt{n} m)\) .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Algorithms
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696668
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximum Cardinality f -Matching in Time O ( n 2/3 m )

Harold N. Gabow
ACM Transactions on Algorithms
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
article

Maximum Cardinality f -Matching in Time O ( n 2/3 m )

Harold N. Gabow
article en

Abstract

We present an algorithm that finds a maximum cardinality \(f\) -matching of a simple graph in time \(O(n^{2/3}m)\) . Here, \(f:V\to\mathbb{N}\) is a given function and an \(f\) -matching is a subgraph wherein each vertex \(v\in V\) has degree \(\leq f(v)\) . This result generalizes a string of algorithms that concentrate on simple bipartite graphs. The bipartite case is based on the notion of level graph, introduced by Dinic for network flow. In general graphs this notion breaks down: Vertices no longer have unique levels, and there are too many levels to analyze the corresponding level graph like bipartite graphs ( \(\Theta(n^{2})\) vs. \(n\) ). We use “natural” levels to prove properties of shortest augmenting trails (e.g., formulas for trail length). We use “shortened” levels to derive the algorithm’s time bound. The algorithm, unmodified, is also efficient on multigraphs, achieving time \(O(\min\{\sqrt{f(V)},n\} m)\) for \(f(V)=\sum_{v}f(v)\) . The special case \(f\equiv 1\) shows the algorithm duplicates the classic time bound for maximum cardinality matching, \(O(\sqrt{n} m)\) .

ACM Transactions on AlgorithmsVol. 21(1)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Maximum Cardinality <i>f</i> -Matching in Time <i>O</i> ( <i>n</i> <sup>2/3</sup> <i>m</i> ) — Harold N. Gabow · ACM Transactions on Algorithms (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS