A Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy between the Extraoral Scanner (Rainbow) and Intraoral Scanner (Medit I500) Digital Impressions in Vitro

Aims: To compare the extraoral and intraoral scanners' accuracy in obtaining implant impressions using an in-vitro reference model.Materials and methods: An upper master model was fabricated with two parallel dental implants at the first and second premolars missing regions in size (4.0mm in diameter and 10mm in length); twenty impressions were made using the intraoral and extraoral scanners to produce twenty digital impressions (10 for each one), which will result in twenty digital casts.The linear distance measurements were performed using (Medit Design) digital measurement by using Medit Intraoral Scanner.Results: In the digital part there was a highly significant difference between measurements for the oral scanner (MeditI500) and extraoral scanner Rainbow using Medit design, the intra-oral scanner (MeditI500) is the highest value which is at a level of significance p0.01.Conclusion: The Medit I500 Intra Oral Scanner is a more accurate impression technique than the Rainbow extraoral scanner in transferring implant position.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜Al-œRafidain dental journal/Maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnān
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33899/rdenj.2022.136720.1178
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy between the Extraoral Scanner (Rainbow) and Intraoral Scanner (Medit I500) Digital Impressions in Vitro

Hasan Mohialdeen, Ahmed Abduljawad Alubaidi, Nagham Kassab
˜Al-œRafidain dental journal/Maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnān
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

A Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy between the Extraoral Scanner (Rainbow) and Intraoral Scanner (Medit I500) Digital Impressions in Vitro

Hasan Mohialdeen, Ahmed Abduljawad Alubaidi, Nagham Kassab
article en

Abstract

Aims: To compare the extraoral and intraoral scanners' accuracy in obtaining implant impressions using an in-vitro reference model.Materials and methods: An upper master model was fabricated with two parallel dental implants at the first and second premolars missing regions in size (4.0mm in diameter and 10mm in length); twenty impressions were made using the intraoral and extraoral scanners to produce twenty digital impressions (10 for each one), which will result in twenty digital casts.The linear distance measurements were performed using (Medit Design) digital measurement by using Medit Intraoral Scanner.Results: In the digital part there was a highly significant difference between measurements for the oral scanner (MeditI500) and extraoral scanner Rainbow using Medit design, the intra-oral scanner (MeditI500) is the highest value which is at a level of significance p0.01.Conclusion: The Medit I500 Intra Oral Scanner is a more accurate impression technique than the Rainbow extraoral scanner in transferring implant position.

˜Al-œRafidain dental journal/Maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnānVol. 24(2)
University of Mosul (IQ), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy between the Extraoral Scanner (Rainbow) and Intraoral Scanner (Medit I500) Digital Impressions in Vitro — Hasan Mohialdeen, Ahmed Abduljawad Alubaidi, et al. · ˜Al-œRafidain dental journal/Maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnān (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS