‘Our project, your problem?’ A case study of the WHO’s mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa

In June 2021 the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) launched an mRNA technology transfer programme. With a South African consortium serving as the hub, the programme aimed to increase vaccine manufacturing capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in view of the "vaccine apartheid" that was observed during COVID-19. Following Clarke's "situational analysis," the present study assessed whether the mRNA programme differs from the approach and practices that comprise current biopharmaceutical production. Numerous documentary sources, including legal agreements underpinning the programme, funding agreements, and patent filings, were reviewed. Semi-structured interviews with 35 individuals, ranging from the programme's architects and university scientists to representatives from LMIC vaccine manufacturers taking part in the programme were also conducted. While the mRNA programme may improve the sharing of knowledge, other design features, in particular, weak conditionalities around product affordability, participants' freedom to contract with third parties, and acceptance of market-based competition, are in line with the status quo. Further, WHO and MPP's tight control over the programme evokes the dynamics that are often in play in global health, to the detriment of empowering LMIC-based manufacturers to generate mRNA products in response to local health needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003173
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Our project, your problem?’ A case study of the WHO’s mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa

Ximena Benavides, Matthew Herder
25 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
8.16
article

‘Our project, your problem?’ A case study of the WHO’s mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa

Ximena Benavides, Matthew Herder
article en
25 citations

Abstract

In June 2021 the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) launched an mRNA technology transfer programme. With a South African consortium serving as the hub, the programme aimed to increase vaccine manufacturing capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in view of the "vaccine apartheid" that was observed during COVID-19. Following Clarke's "situational analysis," the present study assessed whether the mRNA programme differs from the approach and practices that comprise current biopharmaceutical production. Numerous documentary sources, including legal agreements underpinning the programme, funding agreements, and patent filings, were reviewed. Semi-structured interviews with 35 individuals, ranging from the programme's architects and university scientists to representatives from LMIC vaccine manufacturers taking part in the programme were also conducted. While the mRNA programme may improve the sharing of knowledge, other design features, in particular, weak conditionalities around product affordability, participants' freedom to contract with third parties, and acceptance of market-based competition, are in line with the status quo. Further, WHO and MPP's tight control over the programme evokes the dynamics that are often in play in global health, to the detriment of empowering LMIC-based manufacturers to generate mRNA products in response to local health needs.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 4(9)
Dalhousie University (CA), Yale University (US)
GAVI Alliance, Yale University, Public Health Agency of Canada, Public Health Agency, Dalhousie University, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
8.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.