Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing

We study how machine learning techniques can be used to improve tax auditing efficiency using administrative data without the need of randomized audits. Using Italy’s population data on sole proprietorship tax returns and audits, our new approach addresses the challenge that predictions must be trained on human-selected data. There are substantial margins for raising revenue from audits by improving the selection of taxpayers to audit with machine learning. Replacing the 10% least promising audits with an equal number selected by our algorithm raises detected tax evasion by as much as 39%, and evasion that is actually paid back by 29%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Econometrics
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105847
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing

Marco Battaglini, Douglas L. Miller, Luigi Guiso, Chiara Lacava et al.
19 citations
Journal of Econometrics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
13.47
article

Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing

Marco Battaglini, Douglas L. Miller, Luigi Guiso, Chiara Lacava, Eleonora Patacchini
article en
19 citations

Abstract

We study how machine learning techniques can be used to improve tax auditing efficiency using administrative data without the need of randomized audits. Using Italy’s population data on sole proprietorship tax returns and audits, our new approach addresses the challenge that predictions must be trained on human-selected data. There are substantial margins for raising revenue from audits by improving the selection of taxpayers to audit with machine learning. Replacing the 10% least promising audits with an equal number selected by our algorithm raises detected tax evasion by as much as 39%, and evasion that is actually paid back by 29%.

Journal of EconometricsVol. 249
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (IT), Cornell University (US)
Institute for the Social Sciences, Cornell University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
13.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing — Marco Battaglini, Douglas L. Miller, et al. · Journal of Econometrics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS