Comparative modeling reveals the molecular determinants of aneuploidy fitness cost in a wild yeast model

Although implicated as deleterious in many organisms, aneuploidy can underlie rapid phenotypic evolution. However, aneuploidy will be maintained only if the benefit outweighs the cost, which remains incompletely understood. To quantify this cost and the molecular determinants behind it, we generated a panel of chromosome duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and applied comparative modeling and molecular validation to understand aneuploidy toxicity. We show that 74%-94% of the variance in aneuploid strains' growth rates is explained by the cumulative cost of genes on each chromosome, measured for single-gene duplications using a genomic library, along with the deleterious contribution of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and beneficial effects of tRNAs. Machine learning to identify properties of detrimental gene duplicates provided no support for the balance hypothesis of aneuploidy toxicity and instead identified gene length as the best predictor of toxicity. Our results present a generalized framework for the cost of aneuploidy with implications for disease biology and evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Genomics
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100656
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative modeling reveals the molecular determinants of aneuploidy fitness cost in a wild yeast model

H Auguste Dutcher, Michael Place, John F. Wolters, James Hose et al.
17 citations
Cell Genomics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.97
article

Comparative modeling reveals the molecular determinants of aneuploidy fitness cost in a wild yeast model

H Auguste Dutcher, Michael Place, John F. Wolters, James Hose, Julie Rojas, Audrey P. Gasch, Chris Todd Hittinger
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Although implicated as deleterious in many organisms, aneuploidy can underlie rapid phenotypic evolution. However, aneuploidy will be maintained only if the benefit outweighs the cost, which remains incompletely understood. To quantify this cost and the molecular determinants behind it, we generated a panel of chromosome duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and applied comparative modeling and molecular validation to understand aneuploidy toxicity. We show that 74%-94% of the variance in aneuploid strains' growth rates is explained by the cumulative cost of genes on each chromosome, measured for single-gene duplications using a genomic library, along with the deleterious contribution of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and beneficial effects of tRNAs. Machine learning to identify properties of detrimental gene duplicates provided no support for the balance hypothesis of aneuploidy toxicity and instead identified gene length as the best predictor of toxicity. Our results present a generalized framework for the cost of aneuploidy with implications for disease biology and evolution.

Cell GenomicsVol. 4(10)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Office of Science, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, Division of Graduate Education
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.