Statistical characteristics of aquitard hydraulic conductivity, specific storage and porosity

• Laboratory experiments tend to result in lower aquitard K and higher aquitard S s . • Elastic S s is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s. • For ϕ below 0.25, aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ and decrease vice versa. • Inelastic S s generally corresponds to ϕ > 0.37 and elastic S s to ϕ < 0.37. • ϕ outperforms other factors in predicting S s and is significant for predicting K. Aquitard hydraulic conductivity ( K ), specific storage ( S s ) and porosity ( ϕ ) are critical to the modeling of flow and mass and heat transport in groundwater systems, yet comprehensive insights into their statistical characteristics remain limited. This study compiles 456 K values from 47 studies, 202 S s values from 49 studies and 239 ϕ values from 18 studies, followed by rigorous statistical analysis of aquitard K , S s and ϕ with dependence on the features of test method, lithology and burial depth. Additionally, the interrelationships among K , S s and ϕ are analyzed. A predictive model for aquitard K and S s is developed utilizing the random forest (RF) approach. The statistical findings unearth that laboratory experiments tend to yield lower K while higher S s , particularly when burial depths are less than 50 m. Clay, silt clay, and glacial till exhibit comparable K values, in contrast to significantly lower K values observed in shale formations. Aquitard K , S s , and ϕ exhibit depth-decaying characteristics. Between two adjacent depth intervals, 0 – 50 m, 50 – 150 m and >150 m, there is nearly an order of magnitude difference in either K or S s . Aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ when ϕ is below 0.25 and decreases vice versa. This phenomenon is probably attributed to the significant amount of immobile-bound water adhering to clayey particles within the aquitard with a high ϕ value, which reduces the pore space available for water flow. Elastic S s , which indicates recoverable aquitard groundwater depletion, is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s , which indicates permanent aquitard groundwater depletion, implying that the majority of groundwater depletion from aquitards under long-term groundwater exploitation is non-recoverable. The RF-based predictive model indicates that ϕ is a highly important feature for predicting K and outperforms lithology, test method and burial depth in predicting S s . The statistical findings of this study present a valuable basis for aquitard hydraulic parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132066
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical characteristics of aquitard hydraulic conductivity, specific storage and porosity

Walter A. Illman, Long Yan, Chao Zhuang, Zhi Dou et al.
7 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.83
article

Statistical characteristics of aquitard hydraulic conductivity, specific storage and porosity

Walter A. Illman, Long Yan, Chao Zhuang, Zhi Dou, Zhifang Zhou, Hongbin Zhan, Xingxing Kuang, Jinguo Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• Laboratory experiments tend to result in lower aquitard K and higher aquitard S s . • Elastic S s is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s. • For ϕ below 0.25, aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ and decrease vice versa. • Inelastic S s generally corresponds to ϕ > 0.37 and elastic S s to ϕ < 0.37. • ϕ outperforms other factors in predicting S s and is significant for predicting K. Aquitard hydraulic conductivity ( K ), specific storage ( S s ) and porosity ( ϕ ) are critical to the modeling of flow and mass and heat transport in groundwater systems, yet comprehensive insights into their statistical characteristics remain limited. This study compiles 456 K values from 47 studies, 202 S s values from 49 studies and 239 ϕ values from 18 studies, followed by rigorous statistical analysis of aquitard K , S s and ϕ with dependence on the features of test method, lithology and burial depth. Additionally, the interrelationships among K , S s and ϕ are analyzed. A predictive model for aquitard K and S s is developed utilizing the random forest (RF) approach. The statistical findings unearth that laboratory experiments tend to yield lower K while higher S s , particularly when burial depths are less than 50 m. Clay, silt clay, and glacial till exhibit comparable K values, in contrast to significantly lower K values observed in shale formations. Aquitard K , S s , and ϕ exhibit depth-decaying characteristics. Between two adjacent depth intervals, 0 – 50 m, 50 – 150 m and >150 m, there is nearly an order of magnitude difference in either K or S s . Aquitard K tends to increase with ϕ when ϕ is below 0.25 and decreases vice versa. This phenomenon is probably attributed to the significant amount of immobile-bound water adhering to clayey particles within the aquitard with a high ϕ value, which reduces the pore space available for water flow. Elastic S s , which indicates recoverable aquitard groundwater depletion, is about one order of magnitude lower than inelastic S s , which indicates permanent aquitard groundwater depletion, implying that the majority of groundwater depletion from aquitards under long-term groundwater exploitation is non-recoverable. The RF-based predictive model indicates that ϕ is a highly important feature for predicting K and outperforms lithology, test method and burial depth in predicting S s . The statistical findings of this study present a valuable basis for aquitard hydraulic parameters.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 643
Tongji University (CN), University of Waterloo (CA), Hohai University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.