Different Crystal Facet Coupling Effects on the Photocatalytic Properties of BiOX/BiVO<sub>4</sub> (X = Cl, Br, I) Heterostructures: A First-Principles Study

Different crystal facet combinations could greatly influence the type and photocatalytic performance of heterojunctions, but the impacts on BiOX/BiVO4 (in this study, X = Cl, Br, I) remain unclear. Therefore, in this paper, the more easily exposed BiOX(001) and (010) crystal facets are combined with the more easily exposed BiVO4(001) crystal facet to explore the gap in theory. The accurate electronic structure calculations indicate that BiOCl(001)/BiVO4(001) and BiOBr(001)/BiVO4(001) form the undesired type-I heterojunctions, while BiOI(001)/BiVO4(001) forms a favorable direct Z-scheme heterojunction, exhibits a stronger ability to separate photogenerated electrons and holes, and has better photocatalytic performance. However, BiOX(001)/BiVO4(001) suffers from an insufficient reduction capacity. Contrastively and excitedly, all BiOX(010)/BiVO4(001) combinations are direct Z-scheme heterojunctions and possess higher separation efficiency for photogenerated electrons and holes, stronger reduction abilities, and smaller band gaps (meaning better visible light absorption). Therefore, the static electronic structure calculations clearly illustrate that BiOX(010)/BiVO4(001) combinations’ photocatalytic performances are obviously superior to the corresponding ones of BiOX(001)/BiVO4(001) combinations. However, among all heterojunctions, the BiOI(010)/BiVO4(001) heterojunction has larger lattice mismatch rates, reducing the photocatalytic activity and complicating the experimental preparation. Further, the actual photocatalytic performances of the direct Z-scheme BiOI(001)/BiVO4(001), BiOCl(010)/BiVO4(001), and BiOBr(010)/BiVO4(001) heterojunctions surpass that of BiOI(010)/BiVO4(001), while BiOBr(010)/BiVO4(001) presents the best photocatalytic activity. These theoretical results excellently explain the related experiments. Undoubtedly, the effects of different crystal facet combinations on the photocatalytic performance of BiOX/BiVO4 heterostructures must be carefully considered to clarify experimental controversies and guide the preparation of high-performance BiOX/BiVO4 heterostructure photocatalysts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c01703
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different Crystal Facet Coupling Effects on the Photocatalytic Properties of BiOX/BiVO4 (X = Cl, Br, I) Heterostructures: A First-Principles Study

Zuoyin Liu, Bo Kong, Wentao Wang, Min Zhang et al.
11 citations
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
1.13
article

Different Crystal Facet Coupling Effects on the Photocatalytic Properties of BiOX/BiVO4 (X = Cl, Br, I) Heterostructures: A First-Principles Study

Zuoyin Liu, Bo Kong, Wentao Wang, Min Zhang, Tixian Zeng, Hongwei Nie
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Different crystal facet combinations could greatly influence the type and photocatalytic performance of heterojunctions, but the impacts on BiOX/BiVO4 (in this study, X = Cl, Br, I) remain unclear. Therefore, in this paper, the more easily exposed BiOX(001) and (010) crystal facets are combined with the more easily exposed BiVO4(001) crystal facet to explore the gap in theory. The accurate electronic structure calculations indicate that BiOCl(001)/BiVO4(001) and BiOBr(001)/BiVO4(001) form the undesired type-I heterojunctions, while BiOI(001)/BiVO4(001) forms a favorable direct Z-scheme heterojunction, exhibits a stronger ability to separate photogenerated electrons and holes, and has better photocatalytic performance. However, BiOX(001)/BiVO4(001) suffers from an insufficient reduction capacity. Contrastively and excitedly, all BiOX(010)/BiVO4(001) combinations are direct Z-scheme heterojunctions and possess higher separation efficiency for photogenerated electrons and holes, stronger reduction abilities, and smaller band gaps (meaning better visible light absorption). Therefore, the static electronic structure calculations clearly illustrate that BiOX(010)/BiVO4(001) combinations’ photocatalytic performances are obviously superior to the corresponding ones of BiOX(001)/BiVO4(001) combinations. However, among all heterojunctions, the BiOI(010)/BiVO4(001) heterojunction has larger lattice mismatch rates, reducing the photocatalytic activity and complicating the experimental preparation. Further, the actual photocatalytic performances of the direct Z-scheme BiOI(001)/BiVO4(001), BiOCl(010)/BiVO4(001), and BiOBr(010)/BiVO4(001) heterojunctions surpass that of BiOI(010)/BiVO4(001), while BiOBr(010)/BiVO4(001) presents the best photocatalytic activity. These theoretical results excellently explain the related experiments. Undoubtedly, the effects of different crystal facet combinations on the photocatalytic performance of BiOX/BiVO4 heterostructures must be carefully considered to clarify experimental controversies and guide the preparation of high-performance BiOX/BiVO4 heterostructure photocatalysts.

ACS Applied Energy MaterialsVol. 7(19)
China West Normal University (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Guizhou Education University (CN)
Chengdu University of Information Technology, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province, Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.