How water sector reforms institutionalised domination and repression in Tunisia’s authoritarian regimes

This paper analyses how water reforms in Tunisia’s authoritarian regimes came to shape mechanisms of domination, repression, and co-optation anchored in the everyday politics of water allocation and use. The historical study of the water-agriculture nexus in Tunisia (1950–2011) argues that the sector served as a practical and symbolic vehicle to legitimise, produce, and reinforce authoritarian practices and regimes. Drawing on the dialectic of the state and society, this analysis showcases the links between agricultural water governance and practices of state-building. Water policy- and decision-making are put in the context of past political agendas and social unrest, explaining underlying societal perceptions and motivations. On the basis of this analysis, this paper hopes to inspire modest and realistic policy reforms that strategically address contemporary legacy barriers to good water governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544241285647
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How water sector reforms institutionalised domination and repression in Tunisia’s authoritarian regimes

Sophie Bhalla
6 citations
Environment and Planning C Politics and Space
Water Governance and Infrastructure
13.39
article

How water sector reforms institutionalised domination and repression in Tunisia’s authoritarian regimes

Sophie Bhalla
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses how water reforms in Tunisia’s authoritarian regimes came to shape mechanisms of domination, repression, and co-optation anchored in the everyday politics of water allocation and use. The historical study of the water-agriculture nexus in Tunisia (1950–2011) argues that the sector served as a practical and symbolic vehicle to legitimise, produce, and reinforce authoritarian practices and regimes. Drawing on the dialectic of the state and society, this analysis showcases the links between agricultural water governance and practices of state-building. Water policy- and decision-making are put in the context of past political agendas and social unrest, explaining underlying societal perceptions and motivations. On the basis of this analysis, this paper hopes to inspire modest and realistic policy reforms that strategically address contemporary legacy barriers to good water governance.

Environment and Planning C Politics and SpaceVol. 43(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
St. John's College, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.