Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack

Drawing upon case study research investigating the Irish Health Service Executive’s (HSE) response to a fake news attack on their human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign, we argue that responses to fake news should be analyzed from a legitimacy perspective. A model for emotional legitimacy management is proposed in which the HSE and a third-party collaborate to (a) connect with the emotional aspects of the issue; (b) leverage emotions to build vicarious legitimacy; (c) transfer the third-party’s legitimacy to the HSE; and (d) emotionally activate the public. This study contributes to fake news and legitimacy management by moving beyond fact-checking and debunking strategies. We suggest a framework centered on legitimacy in which emotions are used to counteract fake news. Finally, we emphasize the importance of third-party vicarious legitimacy building and the transfer of this legitimacy to the organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business & Society
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503241281632
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack

Glenn Parry, Marie Joachim, Itziar Castelló
4 citations
Business & Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.53
article

Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack

Glenn Parry, Marie Joachim, Itziar Castelló
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Drawing upon case study research investigating the Irish Health Service Executive’s (HSE) response to a fake news attack on their human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign, we argue that responses to fake news should be analyzed from a legitimacy perspective. A model for emotional legitimacy management is proposed in which the HSE and a third-party collaborate to (a) connect with the emotional aspects of the issue; (b) leverage emotions to build vicarious legitimacy; (c) transfer the third-party’s legitimacy to the HSE; and (d) emotionally activate the public. This study contributes to fake news and legitimacy management by moving beyond fact-checking and debunking strategies. We suggest a framework centered on legitimacy in which emotions are used to counteract fake news. Finally, we emphasize the importance of third-party vicarious legitimacy building and the transfer of this legitimacy to the organization.

Business & SocietyVol. 65(2)
St George's, University of London (GB), University of Surrey (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB), ESSCA School of Management (FR)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.