UWB distance estimation errors in (non-)line of sight situations within the context of 3D analysis of human movement

Abstract Integrated Ultrawideband (UWB) and Magnetic Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU) sensors are becoming popular for indoor localization applications, as a higher accuracy can be achieved than with just MIMU sensors. These integrated sensors could extend stability and accuracy in the field of 3D analysis of human movement (3D AHM) if they can deliver position estimates with an accuracy close to 1 cm. Achieving this high accuracy of 1 cm remains challenging, with most studies reporting position estimation errors around 5 cm, often due to Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) conditions and systematic UWB sensor distance estimation errors. Studying the distance error characteristic of UWB in situations of 3D AHM is essential to deal with these errors. While research on UWB distance errors in Line of Sight (LOS) and NLOS situations exists, few studies focus on the NLOS errors caused by the human body and were not in the relevant scenarios of 3D AHM. Therefore, this article examines UWB sensor performance and distance error characteristics in LOS and NLOS situations typical for the 3D AHM. Both the LOS and NLOS situations were studied in the typical 3D AHM distance range of 0.2 m to 2 m. The NLOS situations were studied first with a human subject as NLOS causing object and then with simulated human body segments (PVC pipes filled with water) of varying diameters. In LOS situations, consistent systematic bias errors were observed, along with incidental errors at specific positions in the room. In NLOS scenarios caused by the human and simulated body segments, a consistent and reproducible overestimation of distances was found. The reproducibility of these errors based on relative node and object positions suggests that systematic mitigation methods could significantly reduce errors, enabling more accurate and reproducible 3D human movement analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research Express
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad7e7e
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UWB distance estimation errors in (non-)line of sight situations within the context of 3D analysis of human movement

Jan Willem A. Rook, C.T.M. Baten, Vinish Yogesh, Jaap H. Buurke et al.
2 citations
Engineering Research Express
Gait Recognition and Analysis
0.37
article

UWB distance estimation errors in (non-)line of sight situations within the context of 3D analysis of human movement

Jan Willem A. Rook, C.T.M. Baten, Vinish Yogesh, Jaap H. Buurke, Petrus H. Veltink, Thomas Keizers, Carsten Voort
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrated Ultrawideband (UWB) and Magnetic Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU) sensors are becoming popular for indoor localization applications, as a higher accuracy can be achieved than with just MIMU sensors. These integrated sensors could extend stability and accuracy in the field of 3D analysis of human movement (3D AHM) if they can deliver position estimates with an accuracy close to 1 cm. Achieving this high accuracy of 1 cm remains challenging, with most studies reporting position estimation errors around 5 cm, often due to Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) conditions and systematic UWB sensor distance estimation errors. Studying the distance error characteristic of UWB in situations of 3D AHM is essential to deal with these errors. While research on UWB distance errors in Line of Sight (LOS) and NLOS situations exists, few studies focus on the NLOS errors caused by the human body and were not in the relevant scenarios of 3D AHM. Therefore, this article examines UWB sensor performance and distance error characteristics in LOS and NLOS situations typical for the 3D AHM. Both the LOS and NLOS situations were studied in the typical 3D AHM distance range of 0.2 m to 2 m. The NLOS situations were studied first with a human subject as NLOS causing object and then with simulated human body segments (PVC pipes filled with water) of varying diameters. In LOS situations, consistent systematic bias errors were observed, along with incidental errors at specific positions in the room. In NLOS scenarios caused by the human and simulated body segments, a consistent and reproducible overestimation of distances was found. The reproducibility of these errors based on relative node and object positions suggests that systematic mitigation methods could significantly reduce errors, enabling more accurate and reproducible 3D human movement analysis.

Engineering Research ExpressVol. 6(4)
Thales (Netherlands) (NL), Roessingh Research and Development (NL), University of Twente (NL)
European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.