NovoBoard: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the False Discovery Rate and Accuracy of De Novo Peptide Sequencing

De novo peptide sequencing is one of the most fundamental research areas in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Many methods have often been evaluated using a couple of simple metrics that do not fully reflect their overall performance. Moreover, there has not been an established method to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) of de novo peptide-spectrum matches. Here we propose NovoBoard, a comprehensive framework to evaluate the performance of de novo peptide-sequencing methods. The framework consists of diverse benchmark datasets (including tryptic, nontryptic, immunopeptidomics, and different species) and a standard set of accuracy metrics to evaluate the fragment ions, amino acids, and peptides of the de novo results. More importantly, a new approach is designed to evaluate de novo peptide-sequencing methods on target-decoy spectra and to estimate and validate their FDRs. Our FDR estimation provides valuable information to assess the reliability of new peptides identified by de novo sequencing tools, especially when no ground-truth information is available to evaluate their accuracy. The FDR estimation can also be used to evaluate the capability of de novo peptide sequencing tools to distinguish between de novo peptide-spectrum matches and random matches. Our results thoroughly reveal the strengths and weaknesses of different de novo peptide-sequencing methods and how their performances depend on specific applications and the types of data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100849
Citations
10
Primary Topic
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NovoBoard: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the False Discovery Rate and Accuracy of De Novo Peptide Sequencing

Rui Qiao, Qing Zhang, Baozhen Shan, Shengying Pan et al.
10 citations
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
2.34
article

NovoBoard: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the False Discovery Rate and Accuracy of De Novo Peptide Sequencing

Rui Qiao, Qing Zhang, Baozhen Shan, Shengying Pan, Ngoc Hieu Tran, Ming Li, Wenting Li, Lei Xin, Zeping Mao
article en
10 citations

Abstract

De novo peptide sequencing is one of the most fundamental research areas in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Many methods have often been evaluated using a couple of simple metrics that do not fully reflect their overall performance. Moreover, there has not been an established method to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) of de novo peptide-spectrum matches. Here we propose NovoBoard, a comprehensive framework to evaluate the performance of de novo peptide-sequencing methods. The framework consists of diverse benchmark datasets (including tryptic, nontryptic, immunopeptidomics, and different species) and a standard set of accuracy metrics to evaluate the fragment ions, amino acids, and peptides of the de novo results. More importantly, a new approach is designed to evaluate de novo peptide-sequencing methods on target-decoy spectra and to estimate and validate their FDRs. Our FDR estimation provides valuable information to assess the reliability of new peptides identified by de novo sequencing tools, especially when no ground-truth information is available to evaluate their accuracy. The FDR estimation can also be used to evaluate the capability of de novo peptide sequencing tools to distinguish between de novo peptide-spectrum matches and random matches. Our results thoroughly reveal the strengths and weaknesses of different de novo peptide-sequencing methods and how their performances depend on specific applications and the types of data.

Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsVol. 23(11)
University of Waterloo (CA), Bioinformatics Solutions (Canada) (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.