Multiphysical testing of strength development of cemented paste backfill containing superplasticizer

Current laboratory procedures for curing and testing the mechanical strength of cemented paste backfill (CPB) do not take into account the complex Multiphysics (thermal, T; hydraulic, H; mechanical, M; chemical, C) processes that CPB structures are subjected to in the field. This oversight can lead to unreliable measurements and unsafe designs. In this study, a multiphysical curing and testing procedures for CPB with superplasticizer (CPB-PES) has been developed to evaluate its strength development under THMC curing conditions close to those encountered in the field. The obtained results demonstrated that the strength development of CPB-PES is greatly affected by the THMC factors and their interactions. The contributions of each one of the investigated THMC factors on the strength are not equally similar and greatly depend on the interaction between these factors and curing time. CPB samples with 0.125 % PES that underwent drainage during THMC curing showed a strength increase of up to 809 % after 28 days of curing, compared to the control samples. The strength of CPB-PES samples cured under THMC can be up to 57 % higher than that of samples cured under THC conditions. The results indicate a significant interaction between thermal (T; elevated field curing temperature) and chemical (C; superplasticizer and cement hydration) factors, between chemical (C) and mechanical (M; field curing stress) factors, as well as between thermal and mechanical factors. The influence of the mechanical factor on strength development was observed to be less pronounced compared to the impact of chemical and thermal factor, and is reduced at elevated curing temperatures. The findings underscore the critical importance of accounting for field-relevant THMC factors and their interactions in the determination of the CPB-PES strength development, which is essential for the design of safer and more economical CPB structures, ultimately enhancing mine productivity and safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cement and Concrete Composites
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105772
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Tailings Management and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiphysical testing of strength development of cemented paste backfill containing superplasticizer

Mamadou Fall, Zubaida Al-Moselly
10 citations
Cement and Concrete Composites
Tailings Management and Properties
2.61
article

Multiphysical testing of strength development of cemented paste backfill containing superplasticizer

Mamadou Fall, Zubaida Al-Moselly
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Current laboratory procedures for curing and testing the mechanical strength of cemented paste backfill (CPB) do not take into account the complex Multiphysics (thermal, T; hydraulic, H; mechanical, M; chemical, C) processes that CPB structures are subjected to in the field. This oversight can lead to unreliable measurements and unsafe designs. In this study, a multiphysical curing and testing procedures for CPB with superplasticizer (CPB-PES) has been developed to evaluate its strength development under THMC curing conditions close to those encountered in the field. The obtained results demonstrated that the strength development of CPB-PES is greatly affected by the THMC factors and their interactions. The contributions of each one of the investigated THMC factors on the strength are not equally similar and greatly depend on the interaction between these factors and curing time. CPB samples with 0.125 % PES that underwent drainage during THMC curing showed a strength increase of up to 809 % after 28 days of curing, compared to the control samples. The strength of CPB-PES samples cured under THMC can be up to 57 % higher than that of samples cured under THC conditions. The results indicate a significant interaction between thermal (T; elevated field curing temperature) and chemical (C; superplasticizer and cement hydration) factors, between chemical (C) and mechanical (M; field curing stress) factors, as well as between thermal and mechanical factors. The influence of the mechanical factor on strength development was observed to be less pronounced compared to the impact of chemical and thermal factor, and is reduced at elevated curing temperatures. The findings underscore the critical importance of accounting for field-relevant THMC factors and their interactions in the determination of the CPB-PES strength development, which is essential for the design of safer and more economical CPB structures, ultimately enhancing mine productivity and safety.

Cement and Concrete CompositesVol. 154
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Tailings Management and Properties
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multiphysical testing of strength development of cemented paste backfill containing superplasticizer — Mamadou Fall, Zubaida Al-Moselly · Cement and Concrete Composites (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS