Ecological risks linked with ecosystem services in the upper reach of the Yellow River under global changes

• Ecological risks adversely affect ecosystem services in the upper reach of the Yellow River. • Ecological risks continue to increase under different climate scenarios. • Diverse managements can achieve sustainable development of the upper reach of the Yellow River. There is growing interest in introducing ecological risks (ERs) and ecosystem services (ESs) into environmental policies and practices. However, the integration of ESs and ERs into actual decision-making remains insufficient. We simulated the spatiotemporal dynamics of ESs (e.g., carbon storage, water yield, habitat quality, and soil conservation) and ERs in the upper reach of the Yellow River (URYR) from 2000 to 2100. Additionally, we explored their relationships by combining the InVEST model and a landscape ecological risk model with CMIP6 data. Our main findings showed that regional ERs change in response to land use and environmental dynamics. Specifically, the ER area decreased by 27,673 m 2 during 2000–2020, but it is projected to increase by 13,273, 438, and 68 m 2 under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, respectively. We also observed remarkable spatial differences in ESs and ERs between past and future scenarios. For instance, the source area of the URYR exhibited high ESs and low ERs ( P <0.001), while the ESs and ERs are declining and increasing, respectively, in the northeastern URYR ( P <0.05). Finally, we proposed a spatial optimization framework to improve ESs and reduce ERs, which will support regional sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.09.015
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological risks linked with ecosystem services in the upper reach of the Yellow River under global changes

Zixuan Qi, Guodong Han, Junhe Chen, Chaowei Han et al.
3 citations
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.85
article

Ecological risks linked with ecosystem services in the upper reach of the Yellow River under global changes

Zixuan Qi, Guodong Han, Junhe Chen, Chaowei Han, Ruowei Li, Jian Sun, Jieji Duo, Wen He, Mengqi Zhang, Yunhui Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Ecological risks adversely affect ecosystem services in the upper reach of the Yellow River. • Ecological risks continue to increase under different climate scenarios. • Diverse managements can achieve sustainable development of the upper reach of the Yellow River. There is growing interest in introducing ecological risks (ERs) and ecosystem services (ESs) into environmental policies and practices. However, the integration of ESs and ERs into actual decision-making remains insufficient. We simulated the spatiotemporal dynamics of ESs (e.g., carbon storage, water yield, habitat quality, and soil conservation) and ERs in the upper reach of the Yellow River (URYR) from 2000 to 2100. Additionally, we explored their relationships by combining the InVEST model and a landscape ecological risk model with CMIP6 data. Our main findings showed that regional ERs change in response to land use and environmental dynamics. Specifically, the ER area decreased by 27,673 m 2 during 2000–2020, but it is projected to increase by 13,273, 438, and 68 m 2 under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, respectively. We also observed remarkable spatial differences in ESs and ERs between past and future scenarios. For instance, the source area of the URYR exhibited high ESs and low ERs ( P <0.001), while the ESs and ERs are declining and increasing, respectively, in the northeastern URYR ( P <0.05). Finally, we proposed a spatial optimization framework to improve ESs and reduce ERs, which will support regional sustainable development.

Journal of Integrative AgricultureVol. 24(3)
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN), Guangdong University of Technology (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), National Quarantine Station (KR), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (CN), Institute of Grassland Research (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.