Garmin Fénix 7® underestimates performance at the lactate threshold in comparison to standardized blood lactate field test

Introduction & Purpose Lactate threshold (LT) is a critical performance measure traditionally obtained using costly laboratory-based tests. Wearables offer a practical and noninvasive alternative for LT assessment in recreational and professional athletes. However, the comparability of these estimates with the gold standards requires further evaluation. This study therefore aimed to compare pace and heart rate (HR) at the LT between the Garmin Fenix 7® threshold running test and a standardized blood lactate field test. Methods In our sample of 26 participants (nf = 7 and nm = 19; 25.97 (± 6.26) years, BMI: 24.58 (± 2.8) kg/m2) we determined running pace and HR at LT with two subsequent tests. First, all participants were equipped with a Fenix 7® smartwatch for a calibration phase of 5 weeks. Subsequently, all performed the Fenix 7® threshold running test, which guides the athlete through incrementing HR zones. Based on that, the watch estimated pace and HR at LT. After a break of at least 48 h, they were tested in a standardized, graded blood lactate field test analyzed by the modified D-Max method (Cheng et al, 1992). Results Pace at LT calculated by Fenix 7® (M =11.87 km/h ± 1.26 km/h) was 11,8% lower compared to the field test (M =13.28 km/h ± 1.72 km/h), which was significant (p < .001, d = -1.19). HR estimated by the watch at LT was 1,72% lower (p > .05). LT data obtained in the field test showed greater overall variance. Conclusion Our results suggest sufficient accuracy of Fenix 7® LT estimates for recreational athletes. It can be assumed that for professional athletes, it would fail to provide the nuanced data needed for high-quality training management. References Cheng, B., Kuipers, H., Snyder, A., Keizer, H., Jeukendrup, A., & Hesselink, M. (1992). A new approach for the determination of ventilatory and lactate thresholds. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 13(7), 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021309

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.4ciss056
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Garmin Fénix 7® underestimates performance at the lactate threshold in comparison to standardized blood lactate field test

Annette Schmidt, Jennifer Schlie, Marie Heiber, Pascal Graf et al.
Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Garmin Fénix 7® underestimates performance at the lactate threshold in comparison to standardized blood lactate field test

Annette Schmidt, Jennifer Schlie, Marie Heiber, Pascal Graf, A. Schittenhelm, M. Beckert
article en

Abstract

Introduction & Purpose Lactate threshold (LT) is a critical performance measure traditionally obtained using costly laboratory-based tests. Wearables offer a practical and noninvasive alternative for LT assessment in recreational and professional athletes. However, the comparability of these estimates with the gold standards requires further evaluation. This study therefore aimed to compare pace and heart rate (HR) at the LT between the Garmin Fenix 7® threshold running test and a standardized blood lactate field test. Methods In our sample of 26 participants (nf = 7 and nm = 19; 25.97 (± 6.26) years, BMI: 24.58 (± 2.8) kg/m2) we determined running pace and HR at LT with two subsequent tests. First, all participants were equipped with a Fenix 7® smartwatch for a calibration phase of 5 weeks. Subsequently, all performed the Fenix 7® threshold running test, which guides the athlete through incrementing HR zones. Based on that, the watch estimated pace and HR at LT. After a break of at least 48 h, they were tested in a standardized, graded blood lactate field test analyzed by the modified D-Max method (Cheng et al, 1992). Results Pace at LT calculated by Fenix 7® (M =11.87 km/h ± 1.26 km/h) was 11,8% lower compared to the field test (M =13.28 km/h ± 1.72 km/h), which was significant (p < .001, d = -1.19). HR estimated by the watch at LT was 1,72% lower (p > .05). LT data obtained in the field test showed greater overall variance. Conclusion Our results suggest sufficient accuracy of Fenix 7® LT estimates for recreational athletes. It can be assumed that for professional athletes, it would fail to provide the nuanced data needed for high-quality training management. References Cheng, B., Kuipers, H., Snyder, A., Keizer, H., Jeukendrup, A., & Hesselink, M. (1992). A new approach for the determination of ventilatory and lactate thresholds. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 13(7), 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021309

Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)Vol. 9(4)
Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE), Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.