State Liability in EU Environmental Law: <i>Francovich</i> is Dead, Long Live Compensation?

Abstract In the milestone Francovich case, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) granted individuals, under certain conditions, a right to reparation for Member States’ breaches of EU law. While EU environmental law is rife with well-documented infringements, the Francovich principle, however, has seen little use in practice. This article examines why that is. Through an analysis of the ECJ’s Francovich-related case law, and especially the ECJ’s recent decision in C-61/21 Ministre de la Transition écologique, this study assesses the Court’s interpretation of the Francovich condition that the relevant provision must be ‘intended to confer rights’ on individuals. Against this backdrop, it is shown that the absence of EU environmental law conferring ‘Francovich rights’ is due to the principle’s incompatibility with the collective rights found in EU environmental law. Following from this, this study highlights the incorporation of compensation provisions in three key EU environmental directives as an alternative to Francovich liability and, in so doing, examines the evolving nature of private enforcement of EU environmental law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Law
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqae027
Primary Topic
International Environmental Law and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Liability in EU Environmental Law: Francovich is Dead, Long Live Compensation?

Johan P Stagstrup
Journal of Environmental Law
International Environmental Law and Policies
article

State Liability in EU Environmental Law: Francovich is Dead, Long Live Compensation?

Johan P Stagstrup
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the milestone Francovich case, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) granted individuals, under certain conditions, a right to reparation for Member States’ breaches of EU law. While EU environmental law is rife with well-documented infringements, the Francovich principle, however, has seen little use in practice. This article examines why that is. Through an analysis of the ECJ’s Francovich-related case law, and especially the ECJ’s recent decision in C-61/21 Ministre de la Transition écologique, this study assesses the Court’s interpretation of the Francovich condition that the relevant provision must be ‘intended to confer rights’ on individuals. Against this backdrop, it is shown that the absence of EU environmental law conferring ‘Francovich rights’ is due to the principle’s incompatibility with the collective rights found in EU environmental law. Following from this, this study highlights the incorporation of compensation provisions in three key EU environmental directives as an alternative to Francovich liability and, in so doing, examines the evolving nature of private enforcement of EU environmental law.

Journal of Environmental LawVol. 36(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Environmental Law and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State Liability in EU Environmental Law: <i>Francovich</i> is Dead, Long Live Compensation? — Johan P Stagstrup · Journal of Environmental Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS