Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Study

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising approach for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), aiming to enhance resectability, increase pathological complete response (pCR), improve treatment compliance, survival, and sphincter preservation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TNT, with either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, to those of the standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients with stage II-III LARC who underwent CRT or TNT from seven oncology centers between 2021 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The TNT group was categorized into induction or consolidation groups based on the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Clinical and pathological data and treatment outcomes, including pCR, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Among the 276 patients, 105 received CRT and 171 underwent TNT. The TNT group showed significantly higher pCR (21.8% vs. 2.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower lymphatic (26.3% vs. 42.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.009), vascular (15.8% vs. 32.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and perineural invasion rates (20.3% vs. 37.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Furthermore, 16.9% of TNT patients opted for non-operative management (NOM), compared to 0.9% in the CRT group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The median interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery was longer in the TNT group (17.6 weeks vs. 8.8 weeks, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 3-year EFS was 58.3% for CRT and 71.1% for TNT (<i>p</i> = 0.06). TNT is associated with higher pCR, lower lymphatic and vascular invasion rates, and higher rates of NOM compared to CRT. This supports the use of TNT as a viable treatment strategy for LARC, offering potential benefits in quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183213
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Study

İbrahim Vedat Bayoğlu, Ahmet Bılıcı, Özlem Er, Nargız Majidova et al.
4 citations
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.13
article

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Real-World Study

İbrahim Vedat Bayoğlu, Ahmet Bılıcı, Özlem Er, Nargız Majidova, Arda Ulaş Mutlu, Nuriye Güzin Özdemir, Orhun Akdoğan, Erman Aytaç, Berna Çakmak Öksüzoğlu, Sibel Erdamar, İlhan Hacıbekiroğlu, Ali Kaan Güren, Erdem Sünger, Ömer Fatih Ölmez, Osman Sütçüoğlu, İbrahim Yıldız, Esra Turan Canbaz, Faysal Dane, Elif Şenocak Taşçı, Mustafa Bozkurt, Esra Özen Engin, Onur Saylık, Leyla Özer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising approach for managing locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), aiming to enhance resectability, increase pathological complete response (pCR), improve treatment compliance, survival, and sphincter preservation. This study compares the clinical outcomes of TNT, with either induction or consolidation chemotherapy, to those of the standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this retrospective multi-institutional study, patients with stage II-III LARC who underwent CRT or TNT from seven oncology centers between 2021 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The TNT group was categorized into induction or consolidation groups based on the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Clinical and pathological data and treatment outcomes, including pCR, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. Among the 276 patients, 105 received CRT and 171 underwent TNT. The TNT group showed significantly higher pCR (21.8% vs. 2.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower lymphatic (26.3% vs. 42.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.009), vascular (15.8% vs. 32.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and perineural invasion rates (20.3% vs. 37.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Furthermore, 16.9% of TNT patients opted for non-operative management (NOM), compared to 0.9% in the CRT group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The median interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery was longer in the TNT group (17.6 weeks vs. 8.8 weeks, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 3-year EFS was 58.3% for CRT and 71.1% for TNT (<i>p</i> = 0.06). TNT is associated with higher pCR, lower lymphatic and vascular invasion rates, and higher rates of NOM compared to CRT. This supports the use of TNT as a viable treatment strategy for LARC, offering potential benefits in quality of life.

CancersVol. 16(18)
Sakarya University (TR), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Acıbadem University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Acıbadem University Atakent Hospital (TR), İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Marmara University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.