Comparative evaluation of different endodontic access cavity designs on canal transportation and centering ability using bondent platinum file system on mandibular molar – An in vitro cone-beam computed tomography study

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of different endodontic access cavity designs on canal transportation (CT) and centering ability (CA) using the bondent platinum file system on mandibular molars, utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Thirty extracted human permanent mandibular molars which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups, Group 1 (TEC): Traditional endodontic access cavity (control group), Group 2 (CEC): Conservative endodontic access cavity, and Group 3 (TrEC): Truss endodontic access cavity. The teeth were scanned using CBCT initially followed by random allocation into three groups. Root canals were prepared using Bondent platinum file system in mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals using #25.06 file and in distal canal #30.06 file. Postpreparation, CBCT scans to assess CT and CA at 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex. Data analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: Significant differences ( P < 0.01) in mean CT and CA were observed between Group 1 (TEC) and Groups 2 (CEC) and 3 (TrEC). Dentin removal was highest at 3 mm, followed by 5 mm and 7 mm. The distal canal showed the greatest dentin loss compared to other canals. Conclusion: Minimal access cavity designs (CEC and TrEC) demonstrated less CT and improved CA compared to the traditional access cavity design (TEC). Study limitations acknowledged that conservative access cavity designs result in less deviation (CT) and better centering of the prepared canals compared to the traditional approach (TEC). These results imply the potential benefits of adopting less invasive access cavity designs in endodontic practice to enhance treatment outcomes.