Physics-enhanced machine learning models for streamflow discharge forecasting

ABSTRACT Accurate river discharge forecasts for short to intermediate time intervals are crucial for decision-making related to flood mitigation, the seamless operation of inland waterways management, and optimal dredging. River routing models that are physics based, such as RAPID (‘routing application for parallel computation of discharge’) or its variants, are used to forecast river discharge. These physics-based models make numerous assumptions, including linear process modeling, accounting for only adjacent river inflows, and requiring brute force calibration of hydrological input parameters. As a consequence of these assumptions and the missing information that describes the complex dynamics of rivers and their interaction with hydrology and topography, RAPID leads to noisy forecasts that may, at times, substantially deviate from the true gauged values. In this article, we propose hybrid river discharge forecast models that integrate physics-based RAPID simulation model with advanced data-driven machine learning (ML) models. They leverage runoff data of the watershed in the entire basin, consider the physics-based RAPID model, take into account the variability in predictions made by the physics-based model relative to the true gauged discharge values, and are built on state-of-the-art ML models with different complexities. We deploy two different algorithms to build these hybrid models, namely, delta learning and data augmentation. The results of a case study indicate that a hybrid model for discharge predictions outperforms RAPID in terms of overall performance. The prediction accuracy for various rivers in the case study can be improved by a factor of four to seven.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2024.061
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-enhanced machine learning models for streamflow discharge forecasting

Guga Gugaratshan, Dakota Barthlow, Mayank Chadha, Michael D. Todd et al.
8 citations
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
1.67
article

Physics-enhanced machine learning models for streamflow discharge forecasting

Guga Gugaratshan, Dakota Barthlow, Mayank Chadha, Michael D. Todd, Elissa Yeates, C. McKnight, Zhen Yu Hu, Natalie P. Memarsadeghi, Ying Zhao
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate river discharge forecasts for short to intermediate time intervals are crucial for decision-making related to flood mitigation, the seamless operation of inland waterways management, and optimal dredging. River routing models that are physics based, such as RAPID (‘routing application for parallel computation of discharge’) or its variants, are used to forecast river discharge. These physics-based models make numerous assumptions, including linear process modeling, accounting for only adjacent river inflows, and requiring brute force calibration of hydrological input parameters. As a consequence of these assumptions and the missing information that describes the complex dynamics of rivers and their interaction with hydrology and topography, RAPID leads to noisy forecasts that may, at times, substantially deviate from the true gauged values. In this article, we propose hybrid river discharge forecast models that integrate physics-based RAPID simulation model with advanced data-driven machine learning (ML) models. They leverage runoff data of the watershed in the entire basin, consider the physics-based RAPID model, take into account the variability in predictions made by the physics-based model relative to the true gauged discharge values, and are built on state-of-the-art ML models with different complexities. We deploy two different algorithms to build these hybrid models, namely, delta learning and data augmentation. The results of a case study indicate that a hybrid model for discharge predictions outperforms RAPID in terms of overall performance. The prediction accuracy for various rivers in the case study can be improved by a factor of four to seven.

Journal of HydroinformaticsVol. 26(10)
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.