STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN BUPIVACAINE 0.5% & ROPIVACAINE 0.5%IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS FOR ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

Background: This study contains comparison between Bupivacaine 0.5% &Ropivacaine 0.5% in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in elective upper limb surgeries. It is safer technique compared to GA .Study aims comparison of both local anaesthetic drugs in terms of volume , onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade & duration of analgesia. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double blinded study at tertiary care center compared effect of bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5%. Adults meeting specific inclusion criteria were divided in 2 equal groups 30 patients in each. All patients were given USG guided axillary block. Group A received Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 2.5-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml) while group B received Inj. Ropivacaine 0.5% 2-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml). Outcome measured included volume of drug, onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade. Hemodynamic parameters, VAS score, requirement of rescue analgesic (VAS >4) observed during perioperative period at different intervals. Sensory & motor block were assessed by 3-point scale.VAS score is evaluated by asking the patients to describe their pain between 0 to 10. p-value ≤0.05was considered statistically significant. Results: Comparison between both groups showed that onset of motor blockade (11.3 ±1.48 min ) & sensory blockade (7.46 ± 1.40 min ) was slower in group A , whereas onset of motor blockade (6.91± 1.39 min) & sensory blockade (3.13 ± 0.84 min) was faster in group B. While duration of motor blockade (681.16 ± 15.23 min) & sensory blockade (745 ± 25.12 min) was prolonged in group A compared to shorter duration of motor blockade (480.83 ± 31.67 min ) & sensory blockade (550.16 ± 39.62 min ) in group B. Duration of Analgesia was longer in group A(1388.83 ± 162.85 min ) compared with group B (856.16 ± 139.51 min ). Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.5% is associated with faster recovery of sensory & motor function with better safety profile compared to Bupivacaine 0.5%.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/19421
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN BUPIVACAINE 0.5% & ROPIVACAINE 0.5%IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS FOR ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

Rupal Shah, Yatri K. Joshi
International Journal of Advanced Research
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN BUPIVACAINE 0.5% & ROPIVACAINE 0.5%IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS FOR ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

Rupal Shah, Yatri K. Joshi
article en

Abstract

Background: This study contains comparison between Bupivacaine 0.5% &Ropivacaine 0.5% in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in elective upper limb surgeries. It is safer technique compared to GA .Study aims comparison of both local anaesthetic drugs in terms of volume , onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade & duration of analgesia. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double blinded study at tertiary care center compared effect of bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5%. Adults meeting specific inclusion criteria were divided in 2 equal groups 30 patients in each. All patients were given USG guided axillary block. Group A received Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 2.5-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml) while group B received Inj. Ropivacaine 0.5% 2-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml). Outcome measured included volume of drug, onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade. Hemodynamic parameters, VAS score, requirement of rescue analgesic (VAS >4) observed during perioperative period at different intervals. Sensory & motor block were assessed by 3-point scale.VAS score is evaluated by asking the patients to describe their pain between 0 to 10. p-value ≤0.05was considered statistically significant. Results: Comparison between both groups showed that onset of motor blockade (11.3 ±1.48 min ) & sensory blockade (7.46 ± 1.40 min ) was slower in group A , whereas onset of motor blockade (6.91± 1.39 min) & sensory blockade (3.13 ± 0.84 min) was faster in group B. While duration of motor blockade (681.16 ± 15.23 min) & sensory blockade (745 ± 25.12 min) was prolonged in group A compared to shorter duration of motor blockade (480.83 ± 31.67 min ) & sensory blockade (550.16 ± 39.62 min ) in group B. Duration of Analgesia was longer in group A(1388.83 ± 162.85 min ) compared with group B (856.16 ± 139.51 min ). Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.5% is associated with faster recovery of sensory & motor function with better safety profile compared to Bupivacaine 0.5%.

International Journal of Advanced ResearchVol. 12(08)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN BUPIVACAINE 0.5% & ROPIVACAINE 0.5%IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS FOR ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERIES — Rupal Shah, Yatri K. Joshi · International Journal of Advanced Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS