Anti-Trans Attacks: Interrogating “Gender” in Politics and Gender Scholarship

This essay considers the rapid uptick in anti-trans legislation that targets transgender girls and women as an occasion to critically interrogate the ways that gender is conceptualized and operationalized in political science (Murib 2022). I argue that the disciplinary tendency to view gender as a single-axis facet of identity that is static and rooted in biology needs to be reconsidered in light of two problems. First, collapsing biological sex and gender naturalizes the gender of non-trans women and men as static, normal, and self-evident; transgender people, in contrast, are locked into perpetual processes of gendering themselves against this biological baseline (Enke 2012). Second, and as a result of this limited view of gender, political scientists face difficulties anticipating, understanding, and addressing recent mobilizations invested in maintaining White, heterosexual, and reproductive families as the cornerstone of what it means to be a proper citizen (Alexander 1994).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics & Gender
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x24000217
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-Trans Attacks: Interrogating “Gender” in Politics and Gender Scholarship

Zein Murib
5 citations
Politics & Gender
Gender Politics and Representation
4.65
article

Anti-Trans Attacks: Interrogating “Gender” in Politics and Gender Scholarship

Zein Murib
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This essay considers the rapid uptick in anti-trans legislation that targets transgender girls and women as an occasion to critically interrogate the ways that gender is conceptualized and operationalized in political science (Murib 2022). I argue that the disciplinary tendency to view gender as a single-axis facet of identity that is static and rooted in biology needs to be reconsidered in light of two problems. First, collapsing biological sex and gender naturalizes the gender of non-trans women and men as static, normal, and self-evident; transgender people, in contrast, are locked into perpetual processes of gendering themselves against this biological baseline (Enke 2012). Second, and as a result of this limited view of gender, political scientists face difficulties anticipating, understanding, and addressing recent mobilizations invested in maintaining White, heterosexual, and reproductive families as the cornerstone of what it means to be a proper citizen (Alexander 1994).

Politics & GenderVol. 20(3)
Fordham University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Politics and Representation
4.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anti-Trans Attacks: Interrogating “Gender” in Politics and Gender Scholarship — Zein Murib · Politics & Gender (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS