Impact of In-Pixel Processing Circuit Non-idealities on Multi-object Tracking Accuracy for Autonomous Driving

Deep learning algorithms are robust to a small amount of noise in the input image. Traditionally, image signal processors (ISP) are used with the CMOS image sensor (CIS) to enhance image quality which consume additional energy and latency. Here, we evaluate an ISP-Iess CIS architecture in the presence of noise and other in-pixel circuit non-idealities for the autonomous driving application. By integrating the in-pixel processing circuits to CIS, we filter out the redundant frames and only pass the critical bit information downstream to the backend processor. Such in-pixel processing does not allow ISP operations to be applied to the captured raw image. To reflect these limitations, we model and apply circuit non-idealities to the regenerated artificial raw images as an input to the QDTrack network for multi-object tracking. We evaluate the accuracy loss on the BDD100K dataset and examine its sensitivity on each of the image processing steps. We observe an overall accuracy drop of less than 1.2% in Identification Fl-score (IDFl) and 2.1 % in Multi-Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA), suggesting that an ISP-Iess in-pixel processing circuit is feasible to reject 40% redundant frames directly on CIS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mwscas60917.2024.10658869
Primary Topic
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of In-Pixel Processing Circuit Non-idealities on Multi-object Tracking Accuracy for Autonomous Driving

Qiucheng Wu, Shimeng Yu, Janak Sharda, Shiyu Chang
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
article

Impact of In-Pixel Processing Circuit Non-idealities on Multi-object Tracking Accuracy for Autonomous Driving

Qiucheng Wu, Shimeng Yu, Janak Sharda, Shiyu Chang
article en

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms are robust to a small amount of noise in the input image. Traditionally, image signal processors (ISP) are used with the CMOS image sensor (CIS) to enhance image quality which consume additional energy and latency. Here, we evaluate an ISP-Iess CIS architecture in the presence of noise and other in-pixel circuit non-idealities for the autonomous driving application. By integrating the in-pixel processing circuits to CIS, we filter out the redundant frames and only pass the critical bit information downstream to the backend processor. Such in-pixel processing does not allow ISP operations to be applied to the captured raw image. To reflect these limitations, we model and apply circuit non-idealities to the regenerated artificial raw images as an input to the QDTrack network for multi-object tracking. We evaluate the accuracy loss on the BDD100K dataset and examine its sensitivity on each of the image processing steps. We observe an overall accuracy drop of less than 1.2% in Identification Fl-score (IDFl) and 2.1 % in Multi-Object Tracking Accuracy (MOTA), suggesting that an ISP-Iess in-pixel processing circuit is feasible to reject 40% redundant frames directly on CIS.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Semiconductor Research Corporation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of In-Pixel Processing Circuit Non-idealities on Multi-object Tracking Accuracy for Autonomous Driving — Qiucheng Wu, Shimeng Yu, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS