Diatom silicon isotope ratios in Quaternary research: Where do we stand?

Silicon stable isotope ratios (expressed as δ30Si) in biogenic silica have been widely used as a proxy for past and present biogeochemical cycling in both marine and lacustrine settings, in particular for nutrient utilization reconstructions. Yet an analysis of publication trends suggests a significant decline in the application of δ30Si to Quaternary science questions in the last five years. At the same time as δ30Si proxy applications have decreased, we are learning more about its complexities: an expanding body of work is highlighting biases, caveats or complications involved in the application of δ30Si-based approaches to the sediment record. These include the demonstration of species-specific silicon isotope fractionation factors (i.e. ‘vital effects’) or the potential for Fe or other trace metals to influence silicon isotope fractionation. Others have inferred the potential of biogenic silica dissolution to alter an initial δ30Si value, or questioned the preservation of the initial δ30Si through early diagenetic processes more generally. Another challenge receiving more attention is centered around deconvolving a δ30Si-value into a signal reflecting biological productivity and a signal reflecting changes in the δ30Si of dissolved silicon driven by whole-system and/or circulation changes. Finally, a number of studies focus on analytical difficulties, especially during sample preparation related to achieving and demonstrating a contaminant free biogenic silica. These challenges lead us to posit that the Quaternary science community is moving away from silicon isotope proxies because they are losing confidence in their reliability and usefulness. Here, focusing on the diatoms – the dominant biosilicifiers in both lakes and the ocean – we synthesize progress in understanding nuances and caveats of δ30Si-based proxies in order to answer whether the fall-off in δ30Si-based Quaternary research is warranted. We suggest that with some simple steps that can be readily implemented, and with the closing of key knowledge gaps, there is no reason to believe silicon isotopes do not have a promising future in the Quaternary sciences.\n

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaternary Science Reviews
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108966
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diatom silicon isotope ratios in Quaternary research: Where do we stand?

Virginia N. Panizzo, Claudia Ehlert, Jill Sutton, Patrick Frings
6 citations
Quaternary Science Reviews
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
2.26
article

Diatom silicon isotope ratios in Quaternary research: Where do we stand?

Virginia N. Panizzo, Claudia Ehlert, Jill Sutton, Patrick Frings
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Silicon stable isotope ratios (expressed as δ30Si) in biogenic silica have been widely used as a proxy for past and present biogeochemical cycling in both marine and lacustrine settings, in particular for nutrient utilization reconstructions. Yet an analysis of publication trends suggests a significant decline in the application of δ30Si to Quaternary science questions in the last five years. At the same time as δ30Si proxy applications have decreased, we are learning more about its complexities: an expanding body of work is highlighting biases, caveats or complications involved in the application of δ30Si-based approaches to the sediment record. These include the demonstration of species-specific silicon isotope fractionation factors (i.e. ‘vital effects’) or the potential for Fe or other trace metals to influence silicon isotope fractionation. Others have inferred the potential of biogenic silica dissolution to alter an initial δ30Si value, or questioned the preservation of the initial δ30Si through early diagenetic processes more generally. Another challenge receiving more attention is centered around deconvolving a δ30Si-value into a signal reflecting biological productivity and a signal reflecting changes in the δ30Si of dissolved silicon driven by whole-system and/or circulation changes. Finally, a number of studies focus on analytical difficulties, especially during sample preparation related to achieving and demonstrating a contaminant free biogenic silica. These challenges lead us to posit that the Quaternary science community is moving away from silicon isotope proxies because they are losing confidence in their reliability and usefulness. Here, focusing on the diatoms – the dominant biosilicifiers in both lakes and the ocean – we synthesize progress in understanding nuances and caveats of δ30Si-based proxies in order to answer whether the fall-off in δ30Si-based Quaternary research is warranted. We suggest that with some simple steps that can be readily implemented, and with the closing of key knowledge gaps, there is no reason to believe silicon isotopes do not have a promising future in the Quaternary sciences.\n

Quaternary Science ReviewsVol. 344
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Nottingham (GB), Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE), Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.