On not holding women to higher standards of justice than men: gender justice, even for millionaire women

Abstract In a recent article in this journal, James Christensen, Tom Parr and David Axelsen argue that millionaire salaries are unjust and women have no grounds of fairness to unjust salaries in parity with men. They accept that disrespect is expressed toward women when they are paid less than men because of their gender. Their argument largely replicates a similar argument developed earlier by Anca Gheaus. By drawing on the distinction between ideal and nonideal theory, we argue that Christensen et al . and Gheaus hold women to unacceptably high standards of justice and arguably higher standards than men are held to.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Philosophy
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267124000245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On not holding women to higher standards of justice than men: gender justice, even for millionaire women

Linda Barclay, Tessa McKenna
1 citations
Economics and Philosophy
Political Philosophy and Ethics
2.23
article

On not holding women to higher standards of justice than men: gender justice, even for millionaire women

Linda Barclay, Tessa McKenna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In a recent article in this journal, James Christensen, Tom Parr and David Axelsen argue that millionaire salaries are unjust and women have no grounds of fairness to unjust salaries in parity with men. They accept that disrespect is expressed toward women when they are paid less than men because of their gender. Their argument largely replicates a similar argument developed earlier by Anca Gheaus. By drawing on the distinction between ideal and nonideal theory, we argue that Christensen et al . and Gheaus hold women to unacceptably high standards of justice and arguably higher standards than men are held to.

Economics and PhilosophyVol. 41(1)
Monash University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.