Attitudes on affirmative action targeted to help Black and Hispanic individuals: The roles of knowledge, race, and perceived discrimination

Abstract This study explored factors affecting affirmative action attitudes. Undergraduates at a Hispanic‐Serving Institution completed measures assessing support for Black‐targeted and Hispanic‐targeted affirmative action, perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics, and demographic information. Prior to completing these measures, some participants were randomly assigned to read 10 facts about current racial inequities. An ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of condition (with greater affirmative action support by participants who read facts about racial inequities vs. the control condition), a significant effect of participant race (with greater affirmative action support by Black and Hispanic vs. White participants), and a significant interaction between participant and target race (with greater support of Hispanic‐targeted vs. Black‐targeted affirmative action by White and Hispanic participants, but no difference in support for Hispanic‐targeted vs. Black‐targeted affirmative action by Black participants). Regression analyses revealed that affirmative action support was significantly associated with a Democrat affiliation, a Black or Hispanic race, and perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics. These findings are consistent with social dominance theory (whereby group status threat may influence Hispanic affirmative action support) and the altruism‐born‐of‐suffering theory (whereby adverse discriminatory experiences of Blacks may lead to greater empathy and support for affirmative action).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12428
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes on affirmative action targeted to help Black and Hispanic individuals: The roles of knowledge, race, and perceived discrimination

Crystal D. Oberle, Randall E. Osborne, Ariel A. McField, Marden J. Umanzor et al.
2 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
article

Attitudes on affirmative action targeted to help Black and Hispanic individuals: The roles of knowledge, race, and perceived discrimination

Crystal D. Oberle, Randall E. Osborne, Ariel A. McField, Marden J. Umanzor, David J. Reyna Guerrero
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study explored factors affecting affirmative action attitudes. Undergraduates at a Hispanic‐Serving Institution completed measures assessing support for Black‐targeted and Hispanic‐targeted affirmative action, perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics, and demographic information. Prior to completing these measures, some participants were randomly assigned to read 10 facts about current racial inequities. An ANOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of condition (with greater affirmative action support by participants who read facts about racial inequities vs. the control condition), a significant effect of participant race (with greater affirmative action support by Black and Hispanic vs. White participants), and a significant interaction between participant and target race (with greater support of Hispanic‐targeted vs. Black‐targeted affirmative action by White and Hispanic participants, but no difference in support for Hispanic‐targeted vs. Black‐targeted affirmative action by Black participants). Regression analyses revealed that affirmative action support was significantly associated with a Democrat affiliation, a Black or Hispanic race, and perceived discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics. These findings are consistent with social dominance theory (whereby group status threat may influence Hispanic affirmative action support) and the altruism‐born‐of‐suffering theory (whereby adverse discriminatory experiences of Blacks may lead to greater empathy and support for affirmative action).

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 24(3)
Texas State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.