Honey bees and bumble bees react differently to nitrogen-induced increases in floral resources

Atmospheric and soil nitrogen levels are increasing across the world. Nitrogen addition can alter vegetative and flower traits, including flowering phenology, floral production, and flower morphology, and the quantity and quality of floral rewards such as nectar. However, it is not well understood if and how these changes in floral traits will affect foraging preferences and pollination by different pollinator species. We hypothesized that honey bees (Apis mellifera) would exhibit a preference for plants with increased numbers of flowers, while bumble bees (Bombus spp.) would exhibit a preference for plants with increased nectar production as a result of soil nitrogen addition. A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of varying nitrogen supply levels (e.g., 0, 4, 8 kg N ha-1 yr-1 of N0, N4, and N8) on the vegetative and floral traits of a perennial plant (Saussurea nigrescens), as well as the visitation rates of introduced managed honey bees (A. mellifera) and the native wild bumble bees. The results showed that adding nitrogen increased the number of flowers and nectar production. However, honey bees and bumble bees were responding to different floral resources that induced by nitrogen addition, with honey bees prioritizing the number of flowers and bumble bees prioritizing nectar quantity. The findings shed new light on how plants and pollinators interact when nitrogen is added, as well as how pollinator communities will be affected in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Entomology
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae084
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Honey bees and bumble bees react differently to nitrogen-induced increases in floral resources

Christina M. Grozinger, Juanli Chen, Junpeng Mu, Peiyue Che et al.
2 citations
Environmental Entomology
Plant and animal studies
2.06
article

Honey bees and bumble bees react differently to nitrogen-induced increases in floral resources

Christina M. Grozinger, Juanli Chen, Junpeng Mu, Peiyue Che, Chuan Zhao, Dawei Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Atmospheric and soil nitrogen levels are increasing across the world. Nitrogen addition can alter vegetative and flower traits, including flowering phenology, floral production, and flower morphology, and the quantity and quality of floral rewards such as nectar. However, it is not well understood if and how these changes in floral traits will affect foraging preferences and pollination by different pollinator species. We hypothesized that honey bees (Apis mellifera) would exhibit a preference for plants with increased numbers of flowers, while bumble bees (Bombus spp.) would exhibit a preference for plants with increased nectar production as a result of soil nitrogen addition. A 2-yr field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of varying nitrogen supply levels (e.g., 0, 4, 8 kg N ha-1 yr-1 of N0, N4, and N8) on the vegetative and floral traits of a perennial plant (Saussurea nigrescens), as well as the visitation rates of introduced managed honey bees (A. mellifera) and the native wild bumble bees. The results showed that adding nitrogen increased the number of flowers and nectar production. However, honey bees and bumble bees were responding to different floral resources that induced by nitrogen addition, with honey bees prioritizing the number of flowers and bumble bees prioritizing nectar quantity. The findings shed new light on how plants and pollinators interact when nitrogen is added, as well as how pollinator communities will be affected in the future.

Environmental EntomologyVol. 53(6)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Mianyang Normal University (CN), Chengdu Institute of Biology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Plant and animal studies
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.