FairAD-XAI: Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI Methods in Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Fairness-in-the-loop

Despite significant progress in model developments, evaluating eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) remains elusive and challenging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection using modalities from low-cost or wearable devices. This paper introduces a fine-grained validation framework named 'FairAD-XAI', which provides a comprehensive assessment through twelve properties of explanations, forming a detailed Likert questionnaire. This framework ensures a thorough evaluation of XAI methods, capturing their fairness aspects and supporting the improvement of how humans assess the reliability and transparency of these methods. Moreover, fairness in XAI evaluation is critical, as users from diverse demographic backgrounds may have different perspectives and perceptions towards the system. These variations can lead to biases in human-grounded evaluations and, subsequently, biased decisions from the AI system when deploying. To mitigate this risk, we installed two fairness metrics tailored to assess and ensure fairness in XAI evaluations, promoting more equitable outcomes. In summary, the proposed 'FairAD-XAI' framework provides a comprehensive tool for evaluating XAI methods and assessing the essential aspect of fairness. This makes it a multifactoral tool for developing unbiased XAI methods for AI-based AD detection tools, ensuring these technologies are both effective and equitable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3675094.3678998
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FairAD-XAI: Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI Methods in Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Fairness-in-the-loop

Chin‐Teng Lin, Linh Le, Thomas Do, Quoc-Toan Nguyen et al.
2 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.69
article

FairAD-XAI: Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI Methods in Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Fairness-in-the-loop

Chin‐Teng Lin, Linh Le, Thomas Do, Quoc-Toan Nguyen, Xuan-The Tran
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite significant progress in model developments, evaluating eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) remains elusive and challenging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection using modalities from low-cost or wearable devices. This paper introduces a fine-grained validation framework named 'FairAD-XAI', which provides a comprehensive assessment through twelve properties of explanations, forming a detailed Likert questionnaire. This framework ensures a thorough evaluation of XAI methods, capturing their fairness aspects and supporting the improvement of how humans assess the reliability and transparency of these methods. Moreover, fairness in XAI evaluation is critical, as users from diverse demographic backgrounds may have different perspectives and perceptions towards the system. These variations can lead to biases in human-grounded evaluations and, subsequently, biased decisions from the AI system when deploying. To mitigate this risk, we installed two fairness metrics tailored to assess and ensure fairness in XAI evaluations, promoting more equitable outcomes. In summary, the proposed 'FairAD-XAI' framework provides a comprehensive tool for evaluating XAI methods and assessing the essential aspect of fairness. This makes it a multifactoral tool for developing unbiased XAI methods for AI-based AD detection tools, ensuring these technologies are both effective and equitable.

University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.