Rural residential choices: unravelling the nexus of accessibility and preferences

As rural residents increasingly migrate to urban areas to improve living conditions, employment, and education, closely examining the relationship between residential choices and accessibility becomes crucial. This study employs a Stated Preference Survey (SP) with an orthogonal experimental design and uses the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) to explore the preferences of rural residents for accessibility in the built environment when choosing new residences, including potential disparities between residents on the urban fringe and those in suburban areas. The findings reveal a strong inclination among residents for proximity to essential services such as education, transportation, healthcare, markets, recreation, and amenities. Preferred residential locations include within a 2-kilometre radius of schools, 300 metres from bus stops, 500 metres from medical facilities, 2 kilometres from markets, between 500 metres and 1 kilometre from leisure facilities, and within 1 kilometre of supermarkets. Additionally, commuting time preferences vary, with rural residents favoring a 15-minute commute, peri-urban residents preferring 5 minutes, and distant suburban residents showing no clear preference for commute times ranging from 5 to 15 minutes. These insights carry significant implications for urban and rural planning and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2407580
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural residential choices: unravelling the nexus of accessibility and preferences

Yibin Ao, Panyu Peng, Homa Bahmani, Yunhong Liu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
1.71
article

Rural residential choices: unravelling the nexus of accessibility and preferences

Yibin Ao, Panyu Peng, Homa Bahmani, Yunhong Liu, Igor Martek, Mingyang Li, Haimei Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As rural residents increasingly migrate to urban areas to improve living conditions, employment, and education, closely examining the relationship between residential choices and accessibility becomes crucial. This study employs a Stated Preference Survey (SP) with an orthogonal experimental design and uses the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) to explore the preferences of rural residents for accessibility in the built environment when choosing new residences, including potential disparities between residents on the urban fringe and those in suburban areas. The findings reveal a strong inclination among residents for proximity to essential services such as education, transportation, healthcare, markets, recreation, and amenities. Preferred residential locations include within a 2-kilometre radius of schools, 300 metres from bus stops, 500 metres from medical facilities, 2 kilometres from markets, between 500 metres and 1 kilometre from leisure facilities, and within 1 kilometre of supermarkets. Additionally, commuting time preferences vary, with rural residents favoring a 15-minute commute, peri-urban residents preferring 5 minutes, and distant suburban residents showing no clear preference for commute times ranging from 5 to 15 minutes. These insights carry significant implications for urban and rural planning and development.

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building EngineeringVol. 24(6)
Deakin University (AU), Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.