From performance to morality: How politicians frame bureaucracy, its organizations, and public sector employees

Abstract Politicians frequently voice criticisms vis‐à‐vis bureaucracy, its organizations, and its employees. Previous studies point at the negative impact of this “bureaucratic bashing” on public sector morale, recruitment, retention, and citizen perceptions. Yet, systematic evidence on bashing remains sparse, with even less known about its counterpart: bureaucratic praising. This article aims to fill this gap by conceptualizing both phenomena as forms of framing, by distinguishing macro‐, meso‐, and micro‐levels, and by innovatively using organizational reputation theory to develop a multidimensional framework for the systematic analysis of bureaucratic framing. Empirically, we apply this framework to a novel dataset of 70,853 hand‐coded tweets posted by 33 Dutch politicians, covering a wide range of ideological viewpoints. We find that politicians do not so much frame the civil service performatively, in terms of being lazy (or hard working), but rather bash or praise bureaucratic organizations for their (im)morality, whereby four moral subdimensions can be identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13879
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From performance to morality: How politicians frame bureaucracy, its organizations, and public sector employees

Koen Damhuis, Sjors Overman, Jessy Hendriks
18 citations
Public Administration Review
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
9.98
article

From performance to morality: How politicians frame bureaucracy, its organizations, and public sector employees

Koen Damhuis, Sjors Overman, Jessy Hendriks
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract Politicians frequently voice criticisms vis‐à‐vis bureaucracy, its organizations, and its employees. Previous studies point at the negative impact of this “bureaucratic bashing” on public sector morale, recruitment, retention, and citizen perceptions. Yet, systematic evidence on bashing remains sparse, with even less known about its counterpart: bureaucratic praising. This article aims to fill this gap by conceptualizing both phenomena as forms of framing, by distinguishing macro‐, meso‐, and micro‐levels, and by innovatively using organizational reputation theory to develop a multidimensional framework for the systematic analysis of bureaucratic framing. Empirically, we apply this framework to a novel dataset of 70,853 hand‐coded tweets posted by 33 Dutch politicians, covering a wide range of ideological viewpoints. We find that politicians do not so much frame the civil service performatively, in terms of being lazy (or hard working), but rather bash or praise bureaucratic organizations for their (im)morality, whereby four moral subdimensions can be identified.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(3)
Utrecht University (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
9.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.