Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape
The overarching purpose of carbon accounting is to reduce carbon emissions to meet net-zero targets and minimize the impact of climate change. However, the plethora of methods and approaches used means that products and systems sometimes cannot easily be compared. The mix of regional and life cycle-based systems can mean that we lack global oversight of our emissions and impact. In some situations where a regional approach is used, industry/business/regions are incentivized to reduce their own/territorial emissions, which can mean that an optimal global solution is not adopted. Countries where grid emissions are higher can be selected for production because it reduces regional (not global) carbon levels. Furthermore, these can be areas where the climate impact may be felt the most: not the just transition we aspire to. Our work provides an analysis of the current system together with its challenges and limitations, paving the way towards a more unified framework to create climate justice together with transparent and comparable accounting methodology for industry and regions alike. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Green carbon for the chemical industry of the future'.
Authors
- Lewis J. McDonald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-4732)
- Neha Mehta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0846-0549)
- Jonathan Radcliffe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-6265)
- Marcelle McManus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-8695)
- Ariane S.S. Pinto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4710-8460)
- Taofeeq Ibn‐Mohammed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-0303)
- Jose Luis Hernandez Galvan
- Alok Choudhary (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-9970)
- Chukwudi Emelue
- Thomas Fender
Institutions
- Energy Institute (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Institute for Sustainability (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Published
- 2024-09-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0260
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.82
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- Tata Steel
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council