Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape

The overarching purpose of carbon accounting is to reduce carbon emissions to meet net-zero targets and minimize the impact of climate change. However, the plethora of methods and approaches used means that products and systems sometimes cannot easily be compared. The mix of regional and life cycle-based systems can mean that we lack global oversight of our emissions and impact. In some situations where a regional approach is used, industry/business/regions are incentivized to reduce their own/territorial emissions, which can mean that an optimal global solution is not adopted. Countries where grid emissions are higher can be selected for production because it reduces regional (not global) carbon levels. Furthermore, these can be areas where the climate impact may be felt the most: not the just transition we aspire to. Our work provides an analysis of the current system together with its challenges and limitations, paving the way towards a more unified framework to create climate justice together with transparent and comparable accounting methodology for industry and regions alike. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Green carbon for the chemical industry of the future'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0260
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape

Lewis J. McDonald, Neha Mehta, Jonathan Radcliffe, Marcelle McManus et al.
4 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.82
article

Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape

Lewis J. McDonald, Neha Mehta, Jonathan Radcliffe, Marcelle McManus, Ariane S.S. Pinto, Taofeeq Ibn‐Mohammed, Jose Luis Hernandez Galvan, Alok Choudhary, Chukwudi Emelue, Thomas Fender
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The overarching purpose of carbon accounting is to reduce carbon emissions to meet net-zero targets and minimize the impact of climate change. However, the plethora of methods and approaches used means that products and systems sometimes cannot easily be compared. The mix of regional and life cycle-based systems can mean that we lack global oversight of our emissions and impact. In some situations where a regional approach is used, industry/business/regions are incentivized to reduce their own/territorial emissions, which can mean that an optimal global solution is not adopted. Countries where grid emissions are higher can be selected for production because it reduces regional (not global) carbon levels. Furthermore, these can be areas where the climate impact may be felt the most: not the just transition we aspire to. Our work provides an analysis of the current system together with its challenges and limitations, paving the way towards a more unified framework to create climate justice together with transparent and comparable accounting methodology for industry and regions alike. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Green carbon for the chemical industry of the future'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 382(2282)
Energy Institute (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Institute for Sustainability (GB), University of Bath (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Tata Steel, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.