Enhancing Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Vehicle Active Stabiliser Bar with an Improved Chicken Flock Optimisation Algorithm

An active stabiliser bar significantly enhances the anti-roll capabilities of vehicles. The control strategy is a crucial factor in enabling the active stabiliser bar to function effectively. This paper investigates an active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) strategy. Given the numerous parameters of the ADRC and their significant mutual influence, optimising these parameters is challenging. To address this, an improved chicken flock optimisation algorithm is proposed to optimise the ADRC parameters and enhance its performance. First, a three-degree-of-freedom dynamic model of the vehicle is established, and an active disturbance rejection control-based optimisation model utilising a chicken flock optimisation algorithm is constructed. To tackle the issues of getting stuck in local optima and low precision when dealing with complex problems in the traditional chicken flock optimisation (CFO) algorithm, several strategies, including improved Lévy flight, have been adopted. Subsequently, the twelve parameters of the ADRC are optimised using the improved chicken flock optimisation algorithm. Comprehensive testing on multiple benchmark functions demonstrates that the improved chicken flock optimisation (ICFO) algorithm is distinctly superior to other advanced algorithms in terms of solution quality and robustness. Simulation results show that the ICFO-ADRC controller is significantly superior. In four different complex road condition tests, the ICFO-ADRC controller shows an average performance improvement of 8% compared to the fuzzy PI-PD controller, an average improvement of 82% compared to the non-optimised ADRC controller, and an average improvement of 18% compared to the CFO-ADRC controller. Our findings confirm that this paper was able to provide new solutions for vehicle stability control whilst opening up new possibilities for the application of metaheuristic algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091979
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Vehicle Active Stabiliser Bar with an Improved Chicken Flock Optimisation Algorithm

Duc Truong Pham, Xuesong Zhang, Qiang Zhao, Zhenglin Tang
4 citations
Processes
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
0.81
article

Enhancing Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Vehicle Active Stabiliser Bar with an Improved Chicken Flock Optimisation Algorithm

Duc Truong Pham, Xuesong Zhang, Qiang Zhao, Zhenglin Tang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

An active stabiliser bar significantly enhances the anti-roll capabilities of vehicles. The control strategy is a crucial factor in enabling the active stabiliser bar to function effectively. This paper investigates an active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) strategy. Given the numerous parameters of the ADRC and their significant mutual influence, optimising these parameters is challenging. To address this, an improved chicken flock optimisation algorithm is proposed to optimise the ADRC parameters and enhance its performance. First, a three-degree-of-freedom dynamic model of the vehicle is established, and an active disturbance rejection control-based optimisation model utilising a chicken flock optimisation algorithm is constructed. To tackle the issues of getting stuck in local optima and low precision when dealing with complex problems in the traditional chicken flock optimisation (CFO) algorithm, several strategies, including improved Lévy flight, have been adopted. Subsequently, the twelve parameters of the ADRC are optimised using the improved chicken flock optimisation algorithm. Comprehensive testing on multiple benchmark functions demonstrates that the improved chicken flock optimisation (ICFO) algorithm is distinctly superior to other advanced algorithms in terms of solution quality and robustness. Simulation results show that the ICFO-ADRC controller is significantly superior. In four different complex road condition tests, the ICFO-ADRC controller shows an average performance improvement of 8% compared to the fuzzy PI-PD controller, an average improvement of 82% compared to the non-optimised ADRC controller, and an average improvement of 18% compared to the CFO-ADRC controller. Our findings confirm that this paper was able to provide new solutions for vehicle stability control whilst opening up new possibilities for the application of metaheuristic algorithms.

ProcessesVol. 12(9)
Northeast Forestry University (CN), University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.