Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning And Machine Learning Analysis For Kidney Tumor Analysis

In order to lower death risks, provide the most effective course of treatment, and improve community healthcare, the majority of recent research has concentrated on examining prevalent illnesses in the population. One of the prevalent ailments that has impacted our society is kidney disease. Around the world, kidney tumors (KT) rank tenth in terms of frequency in both men and women. The organization of cancer is a problem that is attracting increasing attention in the domains of bioinformatics and computational biology. This study presents a comparative analysis of the latest developments in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML). While several methods have been proposed to tackle the cancer classification challenge, new research indicates that supervised and deep learning-based methods are the most effective. Healthcare has advanced as a result of the creation of numerous machine learning techniques for awareness evaluation in cancer categorization. It seems that there is a high requirement for the ongoing development of efficient categorization algorithms in order to handle the growth in healthcare applications. The comparative analysis of the proposed classification shows the accuracy as 0.92%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccpct61902.2024.10673250
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning And Machine Learning Analysis For Kidney Tumor Analysis

R. Praveena, M. Anitha, A Yazhini, M. Kalpana Devi et al.
1 citations
AI in cancer detection
0.35
article

Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning And Machine Learning Analysis For Kidney Tumor Analysis

R. Praveena, M. Anitha, A Yazhini, M. Kalpana Devi, Maheswari K Mol, Jinsha Lawrence
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In order to lower death risks, provide the most effective course of treatment, and improve community healthcare, the majority of recent research has concentrated on examining prevalent illnesses in the population. One of the prevalent ailments that has impacted our society is kidney disease. Around the world, kidney tumors (KT) rank tenth in terms of frequency in both men and women. The organization of cancer is a problem that is attracting increasing attention in the domains of bioinformatics and computational biology. This study presents a comparative analysis of the latest developments in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML). While several methods have been proposed to tackle the cancer classification challenge, new research indicates that supervised and deep learning-based methods are the most effective. Healthcare has advanced as a result of the creation of numerous machine learning techniques for awareness evaluation in cancer categorization. It seems that there is a high requirement for the ongoing development of efficient categorization algorithms in order to handle the growth in healthcare applications. The comparative analysis of the proposed classification shows the accuracy as 0.92%.

Anna University, Chennai (IN), Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Paramedical Sciences (IN), PSG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED RESEARCH (IN), Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
AI in cancer detection
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning And Machine Learning Analysis For Kidney Tumor Analysis — R. Praveena, M. Anitha, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS