Comparative Performance of Random Forest versus Gradient Boosting Machines in Detecting Financial Fraud

The detection of fraud conducted through financial operations is still a hard problem for financial institutions with global activity, the problem being the complexity and the scale of the operations. This research focuses on the assessment of the efficacy of ensemble methods especially Random Forest and GBM in detecting and blocking such cases. This paper uses a thorough dataset of different types of financial transactions to study this phenomenon, introduces and evaluates these methods, and analyzes their operational implications in the practical environment. The report analytics derived from the study demonstrate that both Random Forest and GBM performed equally well, with GBM indicating the highest accuracy. The models got high AUC-ROC of 0.92 and 0.95, respectively, and exhibited decreased logarithmic loss and high MCC, which demonstrated their fractionation ability in distinguishing fake transactions. This evidence implies that artificial neural networks, sometimes referred to as ensemble methods, may be suitable for fraud detection in complex financial networks, providing versatile and efficient solutions that can easily adapt to changing trading environments. Firstly, the study confirms the high effectiveness of these methods in fraud detection; secondly, it focuses on the practical aspect of their implementation which offers useful information for financial institutions looking to improve their fraud prevention practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccpct61902.2024.10673140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of Random Forest versus Gradient Boosting Machines in Detecting Financial Fraud

Rishabh Sharma, Deepak Minhas
1 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.35
article

Comparative Performance of Random Forest versus Gradient Boosting Machines in Detecting Financial Fraud

Rishabh Sharma, Deepak Minhas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The detection of fraud conducted through financial operations is still a hard problem for financial institutions with global activity, the problem being the complexity and the scale of the operations. This research focuses on the assessment of the efficacy of ensemble methods especially Random Forest and GBM in detecting and blocking such cases. This paper uses a thorough dataset of different types of financial transactions to study this phenomenon, introduces and evaluates these methods, and analyzes their operational implications in the practical environment. The report analytics derived from the study demonstrate that both Random Forest and GBM performed equally well, with GBM indicating the highest accuracy. The models got high AUC-ROC of 0.92 and 0.95, respectively, and exhibited decreased logarithmic loss and high MCC, which demonstrated their fractionation ability in distinguishing fake transactions. This evidence implies that artificial neural networks, sometimes referred to as ensemble methods, may be suitable for fraud detection in complex financial networks, providing versatile and efficient solutions that can easily adapt to changing trading environments. Firstly, the study confirms the high effectiveness of these methods in fraud detection; secondly, it focuses on the practical aspect of their implementation which offers useful information for financial institutions looking to improve their fraud prevention practices.

Chitkara University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Performance of Random Forest versus Gradient Boosting Machines in Detecting Financial Fraud — Rishabh Sharma, Deepak Minhas · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS