Incongruent Treatment Recommendations Between Left and Right Hip Bone Mineral Densities

Objective The official position of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) is that either hip site can be scanned with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. Whether there is a difference in guideline-based treatment recommendations between hip sites has not previously been assessed. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all individuals who underwent DXA imaging at a single center from September 1, 2018, to October 31, 2019. Women aged ≥ 40 years old and men aged ≥ 50 years old were included. Individuals without bilateral hip measurements or who were on osteoporosis treatment were excluded. The 10-year probability of fracture using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) was calculated for each hip when the worst T-score was in the osteopenia range. Results Of the included participants, 10% (n = 151/1505) had incongruent treatment recommendations (ITR) between the left and right hips. In the ITR group, 70% (n = 106) had osteopenia and 30% (n = 45) had osteoporosis. Age was the only significant risk factor for ITR overall (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09). In the osteopenia group, however, age (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13-1.21), history of parental hip fracture (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.65-6.05), and glucocorticoid use (OR: 4.18, 95% CI: 1.6-11.0) were associated with ITR. In the osteoporosis group, the right hip (femoral neck and total) T-scores were significantly lower compared to the left. Conclusion Measuring bone mineral density on both hips changes treatment recommendations in 10% of people. This was more likely in those with osteopenia who were older, had a parental history of hip fracture, or were on glucocorticoids. Measuring both hips did not add time or cost to patient care. Given the minimal disadvantages to measuring both hips, there should be a strong consideration to change the current guidance of only measuring one hip.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69923
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incongruent Treatment Recommendations Between Left and Right Hip Bone Mineral Densities

Anu Sharma, Abhilasha Singh
Cureus
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Incongruent Treatment Recommendations Between Left and Right Hip Bone Mineral Densities

Anu Sharma, Abhilasha Singh
article en

Abstract

Objective The official position of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) is that either hip site can be scanned with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. Whether there is a difference in guideline-based treatment recommendations between hip sites has not previously been assessed. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all individuals who underwent DXA imaging at a single center from September 1, 2018, to October 31, 2019. Women aged ≥ 40 years old and men aged ≥ 50 years old were included. Individuals without bilateral hip measurements or who were on osteoporosis treatment were excluded. The 10-year probability of fracture using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) was calculated for each hip when the worst T-score was in the osteopenia range. Results Of the included participants, 10% (n = 151/1505) had incongruent treatment recommendations (ITR) between the left and right hips. In the ITR group, 70% (n = 106) had osteopenia and 30% (n = 45) had osteoporosis. Age was the only significant risk factor for ITR overall (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09). In the osteopenia group, however, age (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13-1.21), history of parental hip fracture (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.65-6.05), and glucocorticoid use (OR: 4.18, 95% CI: 1.6-11.0) were associated with ITR. In the osteoporosis group, the right hip (femoral neck and total) T-scores were significantly lower compared to the left. Conclusion Measuring bone mineral density on both hips changes treatment recommendations in 10% of people. This was more likely in those with osteopenia who were older, had a parental history of hip fracture, or were on glucocorticoids. Measuring both hips did not add time or cost to patient care. Given the minimal disadvantages to measuring both hips, there should be a strong consideration to change the current guidance of only measuring one hip.

CureusVol. 16(9)
University of Utah (US), Diabetes Australia (AU), University of Florida (US), Utah Department of Health (US), University of Utah Health Care (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.