Force Decay Behavior of Orthodontic Elastomeric Chains in Simulated Oral Conditions

Background Elastomeric chains are widely used for incisor retraction and space closure. However, the force they exert diminishes over time, and this makes it difficult to determine the actual force transmitted to the dentition. The force decay may also be affected by exposure to saliva, foods, beverages, and prophylactic agents. Objective To assess the force degradation of four commercially available orthodontic elastomeric chains (AlastiK, 3M; Generation II Power Chain, Ormco; Elastic Chain, Morelli; and Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics) over 28 days in simulated oral conditions using tooth movement and a prophylactic fluoride rinse regimen. Method A total of 80 chain samples, with 20 samples of each chain type having four loops each, were stretched to 25 mm on custom-fabricated acrylic resin jigs with provision for a space closure mechanism. The samples were divided equally into two groups: a control group, in which ten samples of each chain type were maintained in artificial saliva at 37°C, and a test group, in which ten samples of each chain type were maintained in artificial saliva at 37°C and additionally subjected to simulated tooth movement with jig closure of 0.25 mm/week and a twice-daily regimen of prophylactic fluoride rinse. Force decay was measured using a digital force gauge at the time of engagement on the jigs, at one hour, four hours, and at one, seven, 14, 21, and 28 days. Percentage force decay was calculated, and the results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tukey, post-hoc Bonferroni, and 't' test. Results Maximum force degradation was observed at one day for all four chain materials in both groups, followed by a steady force loss over 28 days, the difference being significant for all materials at various time intervals (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between any material at any given time in the control group (p>0.05); however, significant differences were observed in the test group. Under simulated oral conditions, force decay was maximum for the Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics (67.9 ± 6.24%), and minimum for the Generation II Power Chain, Ormco (51.9 ± 9.78%) at the end of the test period. Conclusion Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics, and AlastiK, 3M chain, exhibited higher force decay when compared to Generation II Power Chain, Ormco, and Elastic Chain, Morelli. Simulated oral conditions significantly affected the force decay of elastomeric chains, and it may be desirable to change elastomeric chains at 14 days for optimum retraction force.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69908
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Force Decay Behavior of Orthodontic Elastomeric Chains in Simulated Oral Conditions

Pancham Aggarwal, Ravudai Jabbal, Gurpreet Kaur, Anil Prashar et al.
2 citations
Cureus
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
article

Force Decay Behavior of Orthodontic Elastomeric Chains in Simulated Oral Conditions

Pancham Aggarwal, Ravudai Jabbal, Gurpreet Kaur, Anil Prashar, Gurmeet Kaur Virdi, Disha Singh, Sahil Budh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background Elastomeric chains are widely used for incisor retraction and space closure. However, the force they exert diminishes over time, and this makes it difficult to determine the actual force transmitted to the dentition. The force decay may also be affected by exposure to saliva, foods, beverages, and prophylactic agents. Objective To assess the force degradation of four commercially available orthodontic elastomeric chains (AlastiK, 3M; Generation II Power Chain, Ormco; Elastic Chain, Morelli; and Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics) over 28 days in simulated oral conditions using tooth movement and a prophylactic fluoride rinse regimen. Method A total of 80 chain samples, with 20 samples of each chain type having four loops each, were stretched to 25 mm on custom-fabricated acrylic resin jigs with provision for a space closure mechanism. The samples were divided equally into two groups: a control group, in which ten samples of each chain type were maintained in artificial saliva at 37°C, and a test group, in which ten samples of each chain type were maintained in artificial saliva at 37°C and additionally subjected to simulated tooth movement with jig closure of 0.25 mm/week and a twice-daily regimen of prophylactic fluoride rinse. Force decay was measured using a digital force gauge at the time of engagement on the jigs, at one hour, four hours, and at one, seven, 14, 21, and 28 days. Percentage force decay was calculated, and the results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tukey, post-hoc Bonferroni, and 't' test. Results Maximum force degradation was observed at one day for all four chain materials in both groups, followed by a steady force loss over 28 days, the difference being significant for all materials at various time intervals (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between any material at any given time in the control group (p>0.05); however, significant differences were observed in the test group. Under simulated oral conditions, force decay was maximum for the Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics (67.9 ± 6.24%), and minimum for the Generation II Power Chain, Ormco (51.9 ± 9.78%) at the end of the test period. Conclusion Plastic Chain, American Orthodontics, and AlastiK, 3M chain, exhibited higher force decay when compared to Generation II Power Chain, Ormco, and Elastic Chain, Morelli. Simulated oral conditions significantly affected the force decay of elastomeric chains, and it may be desirable to change elastomeric chains at 14 days for optimum retraction force.

CureusVol. 16(9)
Manubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital (IN), Desh Bhagat University (IN), Advanced Pharma (US), Genesis Research Institute (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.