Single-Plate versus Dual-Plate Utilization for Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Series

Objectives Dual plating is the current standard of care for displaced distal humerus fractures and even some metadiaphyseal humeral fractures. Single plate fixation is the current standard of care for humeral shaft fractures when performing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). A role may exist for dual plating of humeral shaft fractures. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes of single versus dual-plating when performing ORIF procedures on humeral shaft fractures. Methods A retrospective study of 143 patients (81 females, 62 males; mean age 47.3) who sustained humeral shaft fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 12A, B, and C) and received either dual or single plating via ORIF between March 2010 and May 2022. Of the 143 patients, 79 (55%) received single plating, while 64 (45%) received dual plating. To account for possible confounders, we collected data on patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, and intra-surgical variables. Primary outcome measurements compared radiographical x-ray imaging (3-months, 6-months, and 12-months), complications, and visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results There was no statistically significant difference between VAS scores, union rates, post operative radial nerve injury, infections, or hardware failure for primary surgical outcomes. Patients were allowed to bear weight as tolerated more quickly in the dual-plating group. An association was observed between the usage of dual plates and osteoporosis. Conclusion In conclusion, we found dual-plate fixation for ORIF of humerus fractures to be not statistically significantly different compared to single plate fixation. Dual-plating has satisfactory radiograph and clinical outcomes compared to conventional single-plate fixation. While we are not advocating for the routine use of dual-plating, the results of our study suggest that the use of dual-plating produces similar outcomes when compared to single-plating for ORIF of a humerus shaft fracture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SurgiColl
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58616/001c.121851
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-Plate versus Dual-Plate Utilization for Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Series

Manan S. Patel, John Dibato, Henry J. Dolch, Kenneth W Graf et al.
1 citations
SurgiColl
Bone fractures and treatments
0.39
article

Single-Plate versus Dual-Plate Utilization for Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Series

Manan S. Patel, John Dibato, Henry J. Dolch, Kenneth W Graf, Matthew Stern, Rakesh P Mashru, Pietro Gentile, David Fuller, James O Gaston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives Dual plating is the current standard of care for displaced distal humerus fractures and even some metadiaphyseal humeral fractures. Single plate fixation is the current standard of care for humeral shaft fractures when performing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). A role may exist for dual plating of humeral shaft fractures. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes of single versus dual-plating when performing ORIF procedures on humeral shaft fractures. Methods A retrospective study of 143 patients (81 females, 62 males; mean age 47.3) who sustained humeral shaft fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 12A, B, and C) and received either dual or single plating via ORIF between March 2010 and May 2022. Of the 143 patients, 79 (55%) received single plating, while 64 (45%) received dual plating. To account for possible confounders, we collected data on patient characteristics, mechanism of injury, and intra-surgical variables. Primary outcome measurements compared radiographical x-ray imaging (3-months, 6-months, and 12-months), complications, and visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results There was no statistically significant difference between VAS scores, union rates, post operative radial nerve injury, infections, or hardware failure for primary surgical outcomes. Patients were allowed to bear weight as tolerated more quickly in the dual-plating group. An association was observed between the usage of dual plates and osteoporosis. Conclusion In conclusion, we found dual-plate fixation for ORIF of humerus fractures to be not statistically significantly different compared to single plate fixation. Dual-plating has satisfactory radiograph and clinical outcomes compared to conventional single-plate fixation. While we are not advocating for the routine use of dual-plating, the results of our study suggest that the use of dual-plating produces similar outcomes when compared to single-plating for ORIF of a humerus shaft fracture.

SurgiCollVol. 2(3)
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Cooper University Health Care (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Bone fractures and treatments
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.