AI content detection in the emerging information ecosystem: new obligations for media and tech companies

The world is about to be swamped by an unprecedented wave of AI-generated content. We need reliable ways of identifying such content, to supplement the many existing social institutions that enable trust between people and organisations and ensure social resilience. In this paper, we begin by highlighting an important new development: providers of AI content generators have new obligations to support the creation of reliable detectors for the content they generate. These new obligations arise mainly from the EU’s newly finalised AI Act, but they are enhanced by the US President’s recent Executive Order on AI, and by several considerations of self-interest. These new steps towards reliable detection mechanisms are by no means a panacea—but we argue they will usher in a new adversarial landscape, in which reliable methods for identifying AI-generated content are commonly available. In this landscape, many new questions arise for policymakers. Firstly, if reliable AI-content detection mechanisms are available, who should be required to use them? And how should they be used? We argue that new duties arise for media and Web search companies arise for media companies, and for Web search companies, in the deployment of AI-content detectors. Secondly, what broader regulation of the tech ecosystem will maximise the likelihood of reliable AI-content detectors? We argue for a range of new duties, relating to provenance-authentication protocols, open-source AI generators, and support for research and enforcement. Along the way, we consider how the production of AI-generated content relates to ‘free expression’, and discuss the important case of content that is generated jointly by humans and AIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09795-1
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI content detection in the emerging information ecosystem: new obligations for media and tech companies

Stuart Russell, Susan Leavy, David Eyers, Adrian Weller et al.
7 citations
Ethics and Information Technology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
7.92
article

AI content detection in the emerging information ecosystem: new obligations for media and tech companies

Stuart Russell, Susan Leavy, David Eyers, Adrian Weller, Alistair Knott, Subhadip Basu, Paul D. Teal, Dino Pedreschi, Przemysław Biecek, Andrew Trotman, Ricardo Baeza‐Yates, Mehmet Haklıdır, Virginia Morini, Yoshua Bengio, Toshiya Jitsuzumi, Sundar Sundareswaran, Tapabrata Chakraborti
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The world is about to be swamped by an unprecedented wave of AI-generated content. We need reliable ways of identifying such content, to supplement the many existing social institutions that enable trust between people and organisations and ensure social resilience. In this paper, we begin by highlighting an important new development: providers of AI content generators have new obligations to support the creation of reliable detectors for the content they generate. These new obligations arise mainly from the EU’s newly finalised AI Act, but they are enhanced by the US President’s recent Executive Order on AI, and by several considerations of self-interest. These new steps towards reliable detection mechanisms are by no means a panacea—but we argue they will usher in a new adversarial landscape, in which reliable methods for identifying AI-generated content are commonly available. In this landscape, many new questions arise for policymakers. Firstly, if reliable AI-content detection mechanisms are available, who should be required to use them? And how should they be used? We argue that new duties arise for media and Web search companies arise for media companies, and for Web search companies, in the deployment of AI-content detectors. Secondly, what broader regulation of the tech ecosystem will maximise the likelihood of reliable AI-content detectors? We argue for a range of new duties, relating to provenance-authentication protocols, open-source AI generators, and support for research and enforcement. Along the way, we consider how the production of AI-generated content relates to ‘free expression’, and discuss the important case of content that is generated jointly by humans and AIs.

Ethics and Information TechnologyVol. 26(4)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Pisa (IT), Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Berkeley College (US), Jadavpur University (IN), Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TR), University of Cambridge (GB), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), The Alan Turing Institute (GB), TUBITAK BILGEM (TR), Silicon Valley University (US), Global Water Partnership West Africa (BF), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Dublin City University (IE), University College London (GB), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Otago (NZ), Chuo University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.