Risk Assessment of Selected CCS Wells through Feature, Event, and Process Method and Comparison of the Barrier Effect

To reduce the CO<sub>2</sub> release in the atmosphere, the carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technique presents a solution in which the CO<sub>2</sub> is captured from the emitting source and injected into a suitable geological formation in the subsurface. For the CCS project to be successful, CO<sub>2</sub> must be trapped underground for hundreds of years. In that respect, good integrity plays an important role as it ensures that the injected CO<sub>2</sub> remains sequestrated in the subsurface. Hence, this study presents a risk assessment technique with the help of which critical elements that can compromise the integrity of the CCS well can be identified. The approach taken for the risk assessment is based on the feature, event, and process (FEP). However, this method gives a qualitative analysis, and to convert it to a semiquantitative one, FEP is integrated with an interaction matrix, incident potential matrix (IPM), and cause-effect plot diagram. In this paper, risk assessment was conducted on two fictitious wells with different well configurations. It was found that cement and casing were the most vulnerable components, while formation water and subsidence were the most problematic elements in the given well system. It was also concluded that the number of plugs and their location in the well could increase or decrease the intensity of the risk levels in the CCS wells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01800
Citations
5
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Assessment of Selected CCS Wells through Feature, Event, and Process Method and Comparison of the Barrier Effect

Khizar Abid, Yon Azwa Sazali, Latief Riyanto, Cătălin Teodoriu et al.
5 citations
ACS Omega
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.03
article

Risk Assessment of Selected CCS Wells through Feature, Event, and Process Method and Comparison of the Barrier Effect

Khizar Abid, Yon Azwa Sazali, Latief Riyanto, Cătălin Teodoriu, M Syafeeq B E Amir, Junghun Leem
article en
5 citations

Abstract

To reduce the CO<sub>2</sub> release in the atmosphere, the carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technique presents a solution in which the CO<sub>2</sub> is captured from the emitting source and injected into a suitable geological formation in the subsurface. For the CCS project to be successful, CO<sub>2</sub> must be trapped underground for hundreds of years. In that respect, good integrity plays an important role as it ensures that the injected CO<sub>2</sub> remains sequestrated in the subsurface. Hence, this study presents a risk assessment technique with the help of which critical elements that can compromise the integrity of the CCS well can be identified. The approach taken for the risk assessment is based on the feature, event, and process (FEP). However, this method gives a qualitative analysis, and to convert it to a semiquantitative one, FEP is integrated with an interaction matrix, incident potential matrix (IPM), and cause-effect plot diagram. In this paper, risk assessment was conducted on two fictitious wells with different well configurations. It was found that cement and casing were the most vulnerable components, while formation water and subsidence were the most problematic elements in the given well system. It was also concluded that the number of plugs and their location in the well could increase or decrease the intensity of the risk levels in the CCS wells.

ACS OmegaVol. 9(39)
Petronas (Malaysia) (MY), University of Oklahoma (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, PETRONAS, International Atomic Energy Agency, Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Sandia National Laboratories
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.