Abstract C070: Barriers to genomic testing reduce clinical trial eligibility for diverse populations

Abstract Tumor genomic testing and cancer clinical trials expand access to precision therapeutics, enhancing patient experience. However, physician and patient barriers impact participation of historically underrepresented patients (HUP), limiting generalizability for those most negatively affected by cancer. We interviewed patients to identify factors impacting genomic testing uptake and clinical trial enrollment. From 09/2021 - 12/2021 we interviewed 16 HUP diagnosed with cancer seen at an ambulatory oncology center: 3 spoke a language other than English, 9 identified as Black, 6 Hispanic/Latinx, 3 other race, and 3 older adult (age 70+). Individual interviews utilized a structured interview guide and lasted 45 minutes. Participants were recruited until thematic saturation was reached and transcripts were coded for major themes. Patients were unsure if they received genomic testing or if testing was recommended (citing possible confusion with medical information). Barriers included education (unclear benefit to participation, investigational drug/device identity, procedures involved), mistrust of research (data privacy concerns), and logistical accessibility (cost, time away from work, transportation). Those tested found it to be an easy process. Several cited that a patient advocate would be a beneficial resource to navigate the process. Barriers around clinical trial enrollment included education (risks of participating, size of the study, investigational drug/device identity), mistrust of research (data privacy, inclusion of HUP in trial, loss of autonomy in decision-making), and logistical accessibility (time commitment). HUP who participated in a trial appreciated additional psychosocial support and clinical monitoring. Patients were emphatically interested in genomic testing and cancer clinical trials when presented as the best course of care, though concerns about side effects from trials persisted. Patient barriers to genomic testing and clinical trials center around education, mistrust in research, and logistical accessibility. Patients who participated in genomic testing and clinical trials had a positive experience. Barriers may be addressed with tailored education, including supportive resources referral. Citation Format: Nadine J. McCleary. Barriers to genomic testing reduce clinical trial eligibility for diverse populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C070.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp24-c070
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract C070: Barriers to genomic testing reduce clinical trial eligibility for diverse populations

Nadine J. McCleary
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Abstract C070: Barriers to genomic testing reduce clinical trial eligibility for diverse populations

Nadine J. McCleary
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tumor genomic testing and cancer clinical trials expand access to precision therapeutics, enhancing patient experience. However, physician and patient barriers impact participation of historically underrepresented patients (HUP), limiting generalizability for those most negatively affected by cancer. We interviewed patients to identify factors impacting genomic testing uptake and clinical trial enrollment. From 09/2021 - 12/2021 we interviewed 16 HUP diagnosed with cancer seen at an ambulatory oncology center: 3 spoke a language other than English, 9 identified as Black, 6 Hispanic/Latinx, 3 other race, and 3 older adult (age 70+). Individual interviews utilized a structured interview guide and lasted 45 minutes. Participants were recruited until thematic saturation was reached and transcripts were coded for major themes. Patients were unsure if they received genomic testing or if testing was recommended (citing possible confusion with medical information). Barriers included education (unclear benefit to participation, investigational drug/device identity, procedures involved), mistrust of research (data privacy concerns), and logistical accessibility (cost, time away from work, transportation). Those tested found it to be an easy process. Several cited that a patient advocate would be a beneficial resource to navigate the process. Barriers around clinical trial enrollment included education (risks of participating, size of the study, investigational drug/device identity), mistrust of research (data privacy, inclusion of HUP in trial, loss of autonomy in decision-making), and logistical accessibility (time commitment). HUP who participated in a trial appreciated additional psychosocial support and clinical monitoring. Patients were emphatically interested in genomic testing and cancer clinical trials when presented as the best course of care, though concerns about side effects from trials persisted. Patient barriers to genomic testing and clinical trials center around education, mistrust in research, and logistical accessibility. Patients who participated in genomic testing and clinical trials had a positive experience. Barriers may be addressed with tailored education, including supportive resources referral. Citation Format: Nadine J. McCleary. Barriers to genomic testing reduce clinical trial eligibility for diverse populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C070.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 33(9_Supplement)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.