Abstract A151: Examining the influence of health insurance, socioeconomic factors, and rurality on breast cancer screening behaviors in Ohio

Abstract Background: Among Ohio women, breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. Inequalities in BC screening are associated with poverty, social injustice, environmental factors, as well as late-state diagnosis, treatment delays, and mortality. The main objective of this study is to examine how BC screening rates differ by rurality and socioeconomic status. Methods: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center conducted a population health assessment survey of Ohioans. The Community Initiative Towards Improving Equity and Health Statues (CITIES) project included two waves of data collection 2017-2018 (Wave 1) and 2023-2024 (Wave 2). Participants self-reported various sociodemographic factors (i.e., race, ethnicity, education level, marital status, and insurance coverage), health insurance status, geographic setting, and BC screening adherence. Adherence with BC screening guidelines was defined as having a mammogram every 2 years after age 50. Baseline demographic characteristics were described using counts and percentages stratified by geographic setting. Adherence with BC screening guidelines was summarized with counts and percentages. The relationship between education, marital status[EP1] , insurance status, rurality, and BC screening adherence were assessed with chi-square tests. Results: A total of 300 women were included in this study. Most women (n=210, 70%) resided in urban counties, while 30% (n=90) lived in rural counties. Among rural residents, 96.7% were White, whereas urban residents were 37.6% White, 35.2% African American, 11.9% Hispanic, 9.1% Somali, and 6.2% Asian. Health care coverage was held by 97.8% of rural and 87.6% of urban residents. Over 67.8% of rural residents and over 65.3% of urban residents had at least some post-high school education. Most rural residents (68.7%) were married, compared to 46.7% of urban residents. Among rural residents, 78.9% (n=71) were within mammogram guidelines. Of the women residing in urban areas, 73.8% (n=155) were within mammogram guidelines and 26.2% (n=55) were not. Individuals with health insurance were over 4 times as likely to adhere to BC screening guidelines than those without health insurance (OR: 4.54, p<0.0001). High school graduates were nearly 5 times as likely to adhere to BC screening guidelines compared to those who did not complete high school (OR: 4.88, p<0.0001). White women were twice as likely to be adherent to BC screening guidelines compared to non-White women (OR: 2.07, p=0.007). Marital status (p=0.219) and rurality (p=0.350) were not significantly associated with adherence to BC screening guidelines. Conclusion: Understanding access to cancer care by education, health insurance status, and race, and how these factors influence BC screening is crucial for knowing the challenges that Ohioans may face in BC care. These findings may lead to future development of interventions targeted at population needs, as identified in this study, and improve equity in BC screening access and BC outcomes. Citation Format: Ruvarashe P. Rumano, Chloe M. Hery, Mohamed I Elsaid, Chasity Washington,, Cecilia R. Degraffinreid,, Electra D. Paskett. Examining the influence of health insurance, socioeconomic factors, and rurality on breast cancer screening behaviors in Ohio [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A151.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp24-a151
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A151: Examining the influence of health insurance, socioeconomic factors, and rurality on breast cancer screening behaviors in Ohio

Ruvarashe P. Rumano, Electra D. Paskett, Cecilia R. DeGraffinreid, Chloe M. Hery et al.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Abstract A151: Examining the influence of health insurance, socioeconomic factors, and rurality on breast cancer screening behaviors in Ohio

Ruvarashe P. Rumano, Electra D. Paskett, Cecilia R. DeGraffinreid, Chloe M. Hery, Chasity Washington, Mohamed I. Elsaid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Among Ohio women, breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. Inequalities in BC screening are associated with poverty, social injustice, environmental factors, as well as late-state diagnosis, treatment delays, and mortality. The main objective of this study is to examine how BC screening rates differ by rurality and socioeconomic status. Methods: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center conducted a population health assessment survey of Ohioans. The Community Initiative Towards Improving Equity and Health Statues (CITIES) project included two waves of data collection 2017-2018 (Wave 1) and 2023-2024 (Wave 2). Participants self-reported various sociodemographic factors (i.e., race, ethnicity, education level, marital status, and insurance coverage), health insurance status, geographic setting, and BC screening adherence. Adherence with BC screening guidelines was defined as having a mammogram every 2 years after age 50. Baseline demographic characteristics were described using counts and percentages stratified by geographic setting. Adherence with BC screening guidelines was summarized with counts and percentages. The relationship between education, marital status[EP1] , insurance status, rurality, and BC screening adherence were assessed with chi-square tests. Results: A total of 300 women were included in this study. Most women (n=210, 70%) resided in urban counties, while 30% (n=90) lived in rural counties. Among rural residents, 96.7% were White, whereas urban residents were 37.6% White, 35.2% African American, 11.9% Hispanic, 9.1% Somali, and 6.2% Asian. Health care coverage was held by 97.8% of rural and 87.6% of urban residents. Over 67.8% of rural residents and over 65.3% of urban residents had at least some post-high school education. Most rural residents (68.7%) were married, compared to 46.7% of urban residents. Among rural residents, 78.9% (n=71) were within mammogram guidelines. Of the women residing in urban areas, 73.8% (n=155) were within mammogram guidelines and 26.2% (n=55) were not. Individuals with health insurance were over 4 times as likely to adhere to BC screening guidelines than those without health insurance (OR: 4.54, p<0.0001). High school graduates were nearly 5 times as likely to adhere to BC screening guidelines compared to those who did not complete high school (OR: 4.88, p<0.0001). White women were twice as likely to be adherent to BC screening guidelines compared to non-White women (OR: 2.07, p=0.007). Marital status (p=0.219) and rurality (p=0.350) were not significantly associated with adherence to BC screening guidelines. Conclusion: Understanding access to cancer care by education, health insurance status, and race, and how these factors influence BC screening is crucial for knowing the challenges that Ohioans may face in BC care. These findings may lead to future development of interventions targeted at population needs, as identified in this study, and improve equity in BC screening access and BC outcomes. Citation Format: Ruvarashe P. Rumano, Chloe M. Hery, Mohamed I Elsaid, Chasity Washington,, Cecilia R. Degraffinreid,, Electra D. Paskett. Examining the influence of health insurance, socioeconomic factors, and rurality on breast cancer screening behaviors in Ohio [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A151.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 33(9_Supplement)
The Ohio State University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.