Abstract A142: A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations

Abstract Background: Disparities in cervical cancer screening rates among marginalized groups is a driver of inequalities in cervical cancer. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a newly emerging alternative to clinician-performed testing to screen for cervical cancer, and has high potential to reduce screening barriers in under-screened and marginalized groups. We study the acceptability in of HPV self-sampling and informational materials among Black/African American, Hispanic/Spanish speaking, American Indian/Alaska Native and transgender/nonbinary populations. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients, ages 30-65, who were female at birth, Black/African American, Hispanic, American Indian, and/or transgender/nonbinary. Telephone interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Patients did not complete the test, rather were asked about the attractiveness, comprehensibility, and acceptability of the HPV self-test, instructions, and messaging. Results: Among 23 completed interviews (5 American Indian/Alaska Native, 7 Hispanic (2 bilingual, 5 Spanish-speaking), 5 Black/African American, and 6 transgender/nonbinary), patients from all groups thought the test was straightforward and convenient, and they would complete the test at home or in clinic. The transgender/nonbinary patients preferred at home testing. American Indian and transgender/nonbinary patients liked that the test might avoid pain, discomfort, and invasiveness. All patients liked the letter and instructions. All groups had specific suggestions for making the materials more culturally acceptable. Conclusions: The HPV self-test and the instructions and materials for use were acceptable for a diverse group of patients. Tailored outreach and messaging should be considered to reduce screening disparities among groups that have been historically underserved by the medical system. Citation Format: Amanda Petrik, Jennifer Rivelli, Allison Firemark, Cheryl Johnson, Blake Locher, Sara Gille, Jennifer Schneider. A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A142.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp24-a142
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract A142: A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations

Amanda F. Petrik, Blake W. Locher, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Sara Gille et al.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Abstract A142: A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations

Amanda F. Petrik, Blake W. Locher, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Sara Gille, Jennifer L. Schneider, Cheryl A. Johnson, Allison Firemark
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Disparities in cervical cancer screening rates among marginalized groups is a driver of inequalities in cervical cancer. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a newly emerging alternative to clinician-performed testing to screen for cervical cancer, and has high potential to reduce screening barriers in under-screened and marginalized groups. We study the acceptability in of HPV self-sampling and informational materials among Black/African American, Hispanic/Spanish speaking, American Indian/Alaska Native and transgender/nonbinary populations. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients, ages 30-65, who were female at birth, Black/African American, Hispanic, American Indian, and/or transgender/nonbinary. Telephone interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. Patients did not complete the test, rather were asked about the attractiveness, comprehensibility, and acceptability of the HPV self-test, instructions, and messaging. Results: Among 23 completed interviews (5 American Indian/Alaska Native, 7 Hispanic (2 bilingual, 5 Spanish-speaking), 5 Black/African American, and 6 transgender/nonbinary), patients from all groups thought the test was straightforward and convenient, and they would complete the test at home or in clinic. The transgender/nonbinary patients preferred at home testing. American Indian and transgender/nonbinary patients liked that the test might avoid pain, discomfort, and invasiveness. All patients liked the letter and instructions. All groups had specific suggestions for making the materials more culturally acceptable. Conclusions: The HPV self-test and the instructions and materials for use were acceptable for a diverse group of patients. Tailored outreach and messaging should be considered to reduce screening disparities among groups that have been historically underserved by the medical system. Citation Format: Amanda Petrik, Jennifer Rivelli, Allison Firemark, Cheryl Johnson, Blake Locher, Sara Gille, Jennifer Schneider. A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A142.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 33(9_Supplement)
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.