How to visualize the spatial uncertainty of landmark representations in maps?

Landmark representations in maps play an important role in spatial tasks such as self-localization, spatial orientation, and navigation. By matching landmarks to their map representations, people can identify their current location and orientation within a map. However, spatial inaccuracies of landmark representations like these of pictograms in maps have been found to affect the ability to successfully match spatial environments to their map representations. These map matching difficulties could negatively affect the performance in spatial tasks. Due to the increasing number of data sources used in modern map services, for example provided by volunteers, map data quality has become more heterogeneous and uncertain. Therefore, solutions for counteracting the negative effects of spatially inaccurate landmark representations on map matching are required. Here, we report two studies that investigate whether visualizing spatial landmark uncertainty can improve map matching. Although suggestions for visualizing uncertainty exist, there is no empirical evidence whether they can intuitively communicate spatial uncertainty of landmark representations. If map users are made aware of potential spatial inaccuracies in a map, they may observe small or moderate spatial inaccuracies of landmark representations but still be able to match these to the represented landmarks. Our findings support this assumption. Using pictogram size, transparency, or circular uncertainty areas around pictograms to communicate spatial uncertainty increased the likelihood of a perceived match between 3D environments or 360° images and a corresponding map representation when landmark representations were spatially inaccurate. Furthermore, our findings indicate that, in addition to landmarks, people use spatial reference points such as road segments for map matching. Thus, if sufficient other spatial reference points are available both in the environment and its map representation, negative effects of spatially inaccurate landmark representations on map matching may be less severe. • Spatially inaccurate landmark representations in maps affect map matching. • Pictogram size, transparency or uncertainty areas can visualize spatial uncertainty. • Visualizing spatial uncertainty of landmarks in maps improves map matching. • Other reference points can compensate for inaccurate landmark representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102441
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to visualize the spatial uncertainty of landmark representations in maps?

Denise O ́Meara, Lars Kuchinke, Dennis Edler, Julian Keil et al.
3 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Geographic Information Systems Studies
5.87
article

How to visualize the spatial uncertainty of landmark representations in maps?

Denise O ́Meara, Lars Kuchinke, Dennis Edler, Julian Keil, Frank Dickmann, Annika Korte
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Landmark representations in maps play an important role in spatial tasks such as self-localization, spatial orientation, and navigation. By matching landmarks to their map representations, people can identify their current location and orientation within a map. However, spatial inaccuracies of landmark representations like these of pictograms in maps have been found to affect the ability to successfully match spatial environments to their map representations. These map matching difficulties could negatively affect the performance in spatial tasks. Due to the increasing number of data sources used in modern map services, for example provided by volunteers, map data quality has become more heterogeneous and uncertain. Therefore, solutions for counteracting the negative effects of spatially inaccurate landmark representations on map matching are required. Here, we report two studies that investigate whether visualizing spatial landmark uncertainty can improve map matching. Although suggestions for visualizing uncertainty exist, there is no empirical evidence whether they can intuitively communicate spatial uncertainty of landmark representations. If map users are made aware of potential spatial inaccuracies in a map, they may observe small or moderate spatial inaccuracies of landmark representations but still be able to match these to the represented landmarks. Our findings support this assumption. Using pictogram size, transparency, or circular uncertainty areas around pictograms to communicate spatial uncertainty increased the likelihood of a perceived match between 3D environments or 360° images and a corresponding map representation when landmark representations were spatially inaccurate. Furthermore, our findings indicate that, in addition to landmarks, people use spatial reference points such as road segments for map matching. Thus, if sufficient other spatial reference points are available both in the environment and its map representation, negative effects of spatially inaccurate landmark representations on map matching may be less severe. • Spatially inaccurate landmark representations in maps affect map matching. • Pictogram size, transparency or uncertainty areas can visualize spatial uncertainty. • Visualizing spatial uncertainty of landmarks in maps improves map matching. • Other reference points can compensate for inaccurate landmark representations.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 99
International Psychoanalytic University Berlin (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
5.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.