Treatment fidelity in clinical trials

In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Physiotherapy
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3128
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment fidelity in clinical trials

Bryan O’Halloran, Mareli Klopper, Jodi L. Young, Chad E. Cook et al.
5 citations
Archives of Physiotherapy
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
5.65
article

Treatment fidelity in clinical trials

Bryan O’Halloran, Mareli Klopper, Jodi L. Young, Chad E. Cook, Steve Karas
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.

Archives of PhysiotherapyVol. 14
Graceland University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Duke University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Bellin College (US), Chatham University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.