Comparison between Co(II) and Ni(II) cycling at goethite-water interfaces: Interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization

Cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) are critical metals for modern renewable energy technologies as well as essential micronutrients for terrestrial plant health and marine primary production. Both metals are commonly surface-adsorbed onto and/or structurally-incorporated into iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals, such as goethite (α-FeOOH), that are ubiquitously present in soils and sediments at the Earth’s surface. In sub- and anoxic environments, aqueous ferrous iron (Fe(II)) generated from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction can induce the recrystallization of goethite and subsequently influences the speciation and mobilization of associated metals, e.g., Co(III) being reduced to Co(II). While it is generally considered that divalent Co and Ni behave similarly at goethite-water interfaces, there lacks a direct comparison of their cycling through goethite in response to Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. Here, under circumneutral anoxic conditions with and without addition of aqueous Fe(II), we performed batch reaction experiments on Co(II)-substituted goethite and Co(II) and Ni(II) sorption experiments on pure goethite. The redox state and coordination environment of Co associated with goethite were determined using high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Co K-edge, and the distribution of solid-bound Co and Ni in goethite following sorption was revealed by sequential dissolution. Our results show that substitution of Co(II) for Fe(III) in goethite has less negative feedback on Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization than Ni(II), which may be related to their differing structural distortions as evidenced by EXAFS. In the absence of Fe(II), aqueous Co(II) is more favourably adsorbed onto and incorporated deeper into goethite than Ni(II), suggesting that Co(II) is more structurally compatible with goethite. The presence of Fe(II) markedly enhances the structural incorporation of both Co(II) and Ni(II) as a result of goethite recrystallization, which in turn can be inhibited by the accumulation of metals at the mineral surface. Furthermore, structurally-incorporated Co(II) is more difficult to be released back into solution (i.e. sum of aqueous and extract fractions) than Ni(II) during Fe(II)-catalyzed goethite recrystallization. Overall, our work highlights the significant differences between Co(II) and Ni(II) in their cycling at goethite-water interfaces and intricate interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. This improves our understanding of their mobilization and distribution in anoxic goethite-rich systems and can provide useful insights for their enrichment and extraction from natural and artificial laterites generated from the enhanced weathering of ultramafic mine tailings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.013
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Co(II) and Ni(II) cycling at goethite-water interfaces: Interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization

Andrew J. Frierdich, Jessica Hamilton, Maximilian Mann, Jeremy Wykes et al.
4 citations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
0.41
article

Comparison between Co(II) and Ni(II) cycling at goethite-water interfaces: Interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization

Andrew J. Frierdich, Jessica Hamilton, Maximilian Mann, Jeremy Wykes, Zhen Wang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) are critical metals for modern renewable energy technologies as well as essential micronutrients for terrestrial plant health and marine primary production. Both metals are commonly surface-adsorbed onto and/or structurally-incorporated into iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals, such as goethite (α-FeOOH), that are ubiquitously present in soils and sediments at the Earth’s surface. In sub- and anoxic environments, aqueous ferrous iron (Fe(II)) generated from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction can induce the recrystallization of goethite and subsequently influences the speciation and mobilization of associated metals, e.g., Co(III) being reduced to Co(II). While it is generally considered that divalent Co and Ni behave similarly at goethite-water interfaces, there lacks a direct comparison of their cycling through goethite in response to Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. Here, under circumneutral anoxic conditions with and without addition of aqueous Fe(II), we performed batch reaction experiments on Co(II)-substituted goethite and Co(II) and Ni(II) sorption experiments on pure goethite. The redox state and coordination environment of Co associated with goethite were determined using high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Co K-edge, and the distribution of solid-bound Co and Ni in goethite following sorption was revealed by sequential dissolution. Our results show that substitution of Co(II) for Fe(III) in goethite has less negative feedback on Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization than Ni(II), which may be related to their differing structural distortions as evidenced by EXAFS. In the absence of Fe(II), aqueous Co(II) is more favourably adsorbed onto and incorporated deeper into goethite than Ni(II), suggesting that Co(II) is more structurally compatible with goethite. The presence of Fe(II) markedly enhances the structural incorporation of both Co(II) and Ni(II) as a result of goethite recrystallization, which in turn can be inhibited by the accumulation of metals at the mineral surface. Furthermore, structurally-incorporated Co(II) is more difficult to be released back into solution (i.e. sum of aqueous and extract fractions) than Ni(II) during Fe(II)-catalyzed goethite recrystallization. Overall, our work highlights the significant differences between Co(II) and Ni(II) in their cycling at goethite-water interfaces and intricate interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. This improves our understanding of their mobilization and distribution in anoxic goethite-rich systems and can provide useful insights for their enrichment and extraction from natural and artificial laterites generated from the enhanced weathering of ultramafic mine tailings.

Geochimica et Cosmochimica ActaVol. 384
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (AU), Australian Synchrotron (AU), Monash University (AU)
Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.