Auditing the audits: evaluating methodologies for social media recommender system audits

Through a simulated Twitter-like platform designed to optimize user engagement and grounded in authentic behavioral data, this study evaluates methodologies for auditing social media recommender systems. Our analysis focuses on the impact of key parameters in sock-puppet audits, the number of friends and session length, on audit outcomes. Additionally, we investigate the algorithmic amplification of political content across different levels of granularity, segmenting users based on political leanings and considering multiple political dimensions beyond declared affiliations. Our findings underscore the necessity of employing realistic parameter settings in audits and highlight the importance of nuanced political segmentation. Amid increasing regulatory scrutiny, this research contributes to enhancing methodologies for auditing social media platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Network Science
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-024-00668-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditing the audits: evaluating methodologies for social media recommender system audits

Paul Bouchaud, Pedro Ramaciotti Morales
3 citations
Applied Network Science
Social Media and Politics
2.87
article

Auditing the audits: evaluating methodologies for social media recommender system audits

Paul Bouchaud, Pedro Ramaciotti Morales
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Through a simulated Twitter-like platform designed to optimize user engagement and grounded in authentic behavioral data, this study evaluates methodologies for auditing social media recommender systems. Our analysis focuses on the impact of key parameters in sock-puppet audits, the number of friends and session length, on audit outcomes. Additionally, we investigate the algorithmic amplification of political content across different levels of granularity, segmenting users based on political leanings and considering multiple political dimensions beyond declared affiliations. Our findings underscore the necessity of employing realistic parameter settings in audits and highlight the importance of nuanced political segmentation. Amid increasing regulatory scrutiny, this research contributes to enhancing methodologies for auditing social media platforms.

Applied Network ScienceVol. 9(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Centre d'Analyse et de Mathématique Sociales (FR), Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes (FR), Communication, Information, Médias (FR), Institute for Complex Systems (IT), Institut des Systèmes Complexes Paris Île-de-France (FR), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Université de Paris, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, CHIST-ERA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Media and Politics
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.