Potential of multimodal large language models for data mining of medical images and free-text reports

Medical images and radiology reports are essential for physicians to diagnose medical conditions. However, the vast diversity and cross-source heterogeneity inherent in these data have posed significant challenges to the generalizability of current data-mining methods for clinical decision-making. Recently, multimodal large language models (MLLMs), especially Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models, have revolutionized numerous domains, significantly impacting the medical field. In this study, we conducted a detailed evaluation of the performance of the Gemini series models (including Gemini-1.0-Pro-Vision, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Gemini-1.5-Flash) and GPT series models (including GPT-4o, GPT-4-Turbo, and GPT-3.5-Turbo) across 14 medical datasets, covering 5 medical imaging categories (dermatology, radiology, dentistry, ophthalmology, and endoscopy) and 3 radiology report datasets. The investigated tasks encompass disease classification, lesion segmentation, anatomical localization, disease diagnosis, report generation, and lesion detection. Moreover, we also validated the performance of the Claude-3-Opus, Yi-Large, Yi-Large-Turbo, and LLaMA 3 models to gain a comprehensive understanding of the MLLM models in the medical field. Our experimental results demonstrated that Gemini-series models excelled in report generation and lesion detection but faces challenges in disease classification and anatomical localization. Conversely, GPT-series models exhibited proficiency in lesion segmentation and anatomical localization but encountered difficulties in disease diagnosis and lesion detection. Additionally, both the Gemini series and GPT series contain models that have demonstrated commendable generation efficiency. While both models hold promise in reducing physician workload, alleviating pressure on limited healthcare resources, and fostering collaboration between clinical practitioners and artificial intelligence technologies, substantial enhancements and comprehensive validations remain imperative before clinical deployment. • We compare GPT-4 and Gemini models in biomedical image analysis, focusing on strengths and limits in classification, segmentation, and reporting. • Our study rigorously evaluates the accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability of these models, offering insights for optimized biomedical applications. • Our research highlights the transformative impact of MLLM in diagnostics and treatment planning, setting a benchmark for future AGI in biomedical fields.